Blending the Principles of Participatory Action Research Approach and Elements of Grounded Theory in a Disaster Risk Reduction Education Case Study

Abstract

This paper presents an exemplar of blending the principles of participatory action research and elements of grounded theory in a disaster risk reduction education case study. It illustrates and describes a modified methodological approach that was used during the needs’ assessment and analysis phase of a multiphase study on teaching of disaster risk reduction in science among public schools in Biliran Province, the Philippines. The approach was conceived upon considering the overarching aim of the study which is the effective, efficient, inclusive, and proactive teaching of disaster risk reduction in science, the complex nature of the disaster risk reduction education, and the multiple stakeholders involved in disaster risk reduction among public schools. Results revealed that the modified methodological approach provided a co-learning environment for both participants and researchers, created an opportunity to maximize participation toward generating knowledge, prioritizing problems, and conceptualizing solutions, strengthened the data collection and analysis process, hence ensuring quality in the entire research process, and addressed the participation issues pointed out in grounded theory studies. The modified methodological approach may be relevant and applicable to similar studies that are complex and emerging like the teaching of disaster risk reduction in science.

From “stuck” to satisfied: Aboriginal people’s experience of culturally safe care with interpreters in a Northern Territory hospital

“…A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify key informants who, as per PAR, had a vested interest in the area of study and could provide “information rich cases” which exemplified dysfunction and exposed opportunities for change [ 29 , 30 , 47 , 48 ]. Also consistent with PAR, some participants were researchers.…”

“The talking bit of medicine, that’s the most important bit”: doctors and Aboriginal interpreters collaborate to transform culturally competent hospital care

“…Consistent with PAR [ 32 , 43 ], doctors and NT AIS staff were purposively sampled based on their work roster, anticipated capacity to contribute to “the development of knowledge” [ 44 ] and commitment to the aims of the pilot. All participants provided written consent to participate.…”

A community-based program to reduce acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in northern Australia

“…Potential ACWs, who were respected within their communities and had experience as health professionals and/or community researchers, were identified through discussions with community leaders and clinic staff. As per PAR, participants are both the researcher and the researched; they have a vested interest in the topic and lived experience to share [ 10 , 13 ]. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify families and clinic health professionals who could provide “information rich cases” [ 14 ].…”