2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-017-2054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blending modification of PBS/PLA and its enzymatic degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reactive compatibilization is considered to be a method for suppressing the phase separation and improving the compatibility of immiscible polymer blends [42,43,44]. In the mixing process, reactive compatibilizers react with both blend components to couple the phases within a short processing time [28], thereby enhancing the compatibility and interfacial interactions of the blends [45].…”
Section: Toughness Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reactive compatibilization is considered to be a method for suppressing the phase separation and improving the compatibility of immiscible polymer blends [42,43,44]. In the mixing process, reactive compatibilizers react with both blend components to couple the phases within a short processing time [28], thereby enhancing the compatibility and interfacial interactions of the blends [45].…”
Section: Toughness Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They must be distributed at a high rate in the polymer melt during blending [28]. A large number of reactive compatibilizers for PLA/PBS blends have been reported, for example diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) [46], lysine triisocyanate (LTI) [42], lysine diisocyanate (LDI) [42], glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) [47], dicumyl peroxide (DCP) [16,44,48], benzoyl peroxide (BPO) [43], organoclays and epoxy functionality-containing components [49], epoxy functionality-containing components (Joncryl TM ) [24].…”
Section: Toughness Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it was interestingly enough to note that the pure PLA lost a maximum weight of 21%, while the introduction of PGO‐PLLA resulted in a weight loss rate of 12%, which significantly inhibited the degradation of PLA. Hu et al found that the PLA was not degraded completely because of the crosslink between poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and PLA. This might be due to the fact that the oxygen‐containing functional groups on the surface of PGO‐PLLA formed strong hydrogen bonds with PLA, which enhanced the binding between the PLA molecular chains and ultimately hindered the degradation of the blend by proteinase K.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of PLA-based binary blends have been proposed to improve toughness of PLA. It is worthy to note the interesting properties of PLA blends with poly(-caprolactone) -PCL [30][31][32][33], poly(hydroxybutyrate) -PHB [1,34], poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) -PHBV [35][36][37], thermoplastic starches -TPSs [38,39], poly(butylene adipate-coterephthalate) -PBAT [40], poly(butylene succinate) -PBS [41][42][43] -PBSA, poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) [44] and so on. As indicated previously, rubber or rubber-like polymers have been proposed as impact modifiers in polymer and composites systems with remarkable positive effects on overall toughness [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%