Hydrogen
fueling stations require multiple stages of compression
to achieve the pressure needed to refuel hydrogen fuel cell electric
vehicles at 700 bar. The physical compression equipment constitutes
a large share of the total investment cost of hydrogen fueling stations.
Hydrogen carriers, i.e., materials that carry either physisorbed or
chemisorbed H2, provide an alternate approach to transport
and deliver higher densities of hydrogen to the fueling station at
lower pressures. Additionally, some liquid phase hydrogen carriers
(LPHCs) are defined by thermodynamic properties that allow H2 release at elevated pressure, thus providing an opportunity to reduce
the number of compressors at the fueling station. This study compares
a series of LPHCs and evaluates the approach of using aqueous solutions
of formic acid (FA) to deliver high volumetric densities of H2 to fueling stations and provide a first step of compression.
While hydrogen release from most liquid carriers will provide hydrogen
slightly above ambient pressure at high temperatures, hydrogen release
from the decomposition of FA can provide hydrogen at pressures of
several hundred bars at moderate temperatures. A challenge of formic
acid is that the high pressure hydrogen is accompanied by 1 equivalent
of carbon dioxide and thus requires subsequent separation and purification
operations. Nevertheless, formic acid has the advantage of being liquid,
which simplifies its handling and provides a continuous supply to
a release unit. Furthermore, the energy demand for hydrogen release
from FA is lower than for most alternative hydrogen carrier materials.