2013
DOI: 10.1080/10875301.2013.800626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blended Learning to Increase Student Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These kinds of tools are offered by the learning management system such as, Blackboard®. According to Lyons and Evans (2013) and Jonson (2011), the use of such technologies is perceived to enhance students' engagement in learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These kinds of tools are offered by the learning management system such as, Blackboard®. According to Lyons and Evans (2013) and Jonson (2011), the use of such technologies is perceived to enhance students' engagement in learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the researchers' view, BL practices increase the effectiveness of the teaching and learning processes, thus it enhances learning beyond what might be accomplished with traditional learning and teaching practices. Lyons and Evans (2013) define BL as a "teaching model that incorporates technology while retaining the F2F element" (p. 43). For instance, BL incorporates technologies such as podcasts, lecture capture, online chat, and discussion boards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other ostensibly useful technology employed in supporting the transformation of curricula to blended environments includes online discussion forums (Hudson, 2014;Lyons and Evans, 2013) and Skype (Stephens and Hennefer, 2013). Both the pilot study by Hudson (2014) and the mixed method case study by Lyons and Evans (2013) reported favourable engagement and learning results after discussion board forums were integrated into undergraduate course designs.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, according to the literature sources evaluated for compiling this review (Epstein and Ray, 2014;Goldman et al, 2008;Halic et al, 2010;Hudson, 2014;Lyons and Evans, 2013;Moeller et al, 2010;Morley, 2012;Stephens and Hennefer, 2013;Wilson and Ganley, 2014), there are various modalities that this flexible learning design can utilise for delivery. In a randomised trial of 237 medical undergraduate students, Moeller et al (2010) compared the effect various combinations of wiki, chat and interactive diagnostic context (IDC) had on blended problem based learning, group processes and learner satisfaction.…”
Section: Learning Approach Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ODFs are flexible, convenient and accessible for students (Warren, 2008), encourage social interaction (Blackmon, 2012) and intense participation in the learning process (Dorman & Fraser, 2009). Other benefits of ODF are the challenges given to students to construct knowledge leading to higher cognitive outcomes (Lyons & Evans, 2013;Pena-Shaff & Nicholls, 2004;Struyven, Dochy, Janssens, & Gielen, 2006). Bonk, Kim, and Zeng (2006) have predicted the future of blended learning as self determined, increased connectedness, community and collaboration and changed instructor roles and this is what is presently happening with the use of different tools for e-learning in university education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%