2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not being able to touch the cadaver and see each detail in the cadaver dissection is a disadvantage (Petersson, Sinkvist, Wang and Smedb, 2009), and the online resources should not be used as a replacemtne for the conventional courses led by instructors (Schmidt, Reinehr, Leucht, Behrendt, Geiler, and Britsch, 2011). On the other hand, in a different study it was determined that students' social perception is negative for blended learning because they are not yet accustomed to using technology in education (Makhdoom, Khoshhal, Algaidi, Heissam, & Zolaly, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not being able to touch the cadaver and see each detail in the cadaver dissection is a disadvantage (Petersson, Sinkvist, Wang and Smedb, 2009), and the online resources should not be used as a replacemtne for the conventional courses led by instructors (Schmidt, Reinehr, Leucht, Behrendt, Geiler, and Britsch, 2011). On the other hand, in a different study it was determined that students' social perception is negative for blended learning because they are not yet accustomed to using technology in education (Makhdoom, Khoshhal, Algaidi, Heissam, & Zolaly, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Ramakrisnan et al [50] compared three research models: Gupta, S, Packham et al, and Khan, identified the problems faced using e-learning. Makhdoom et al [21] conducted a comparative cross-sectional university-based study to assess the effectiveness of blended learning.…”
Section: E Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 article is about clinical medicine [21]. Makhdoom, et al [21] assessed the effectiveness of blended learning in studying family medicine as an example of a clinical medical science. 1 article is about Intelligent virtual microscopy [22].…”
Section: B Blended Learning As a Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blended Learning can provide improvement in access to information, ease in updating, distribution, and standardization of content, personalized tutoring, and accountability. A comparative cross-sectional study showed that blended learning is statistically and significantly better than traditional learning in domains of the educational environment, such as access to material and comfort of updating and distribution, and in all types of examination: written, objective structured clinical, and case scenarios (6). Learners have more control over the content, learning sequence, pace of learning, time, and often, media, which allows them to tailor their experience to meet personal learning objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%