2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1013.2003.00360.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blended learning approach in teacher education: combining face‐to‐face instruction, multimedia viewing and online discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Students' learning mostly results from an interface between the provided content and pedagogical strategies when these engage the learner's interest (Khine & Lourdusamy, 2003 (Mackness, Waite, Roberts, & Lovegrove, 2013). Some other factors, including 'flexibility to do and read,' 'course design,' and 'receiving feedback from a knowledgeable person,' are also identified as influential factors on students' learning in cMOOCs (Fournier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Course Features: Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' learning mostly results from an interface between the provided content and pedagogical strategies when these engage the learner's interest (Khine & Lourdusamy, 2003 (Mackness, Waite, Roberts, & Lovegrove, 2013). Some other factors, including 'flexibility to do and read,' 'course design,' and 'receiving feedback from a knowledgeable person,' are also identified as influential factors on students' learning in cMOOCs (Fournier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Course Features: Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexible contents are easily handled by the instructor, based on the student's needs or situations, such as tests, assignments, discussions, etc., whereas the pre-recorded contents are a rigid set of information and are inflexible, including streaming the contents on the media, directing a learner down a specific path of learning outcomes. Blended learning, as a more learner-centered educational approach, allows for communication, collaboration and interaction [39][40][41], as well as flexibility for the instructor to overcome the drawbacks of the unilateral transfer of information, lack of interaction, isolation, etc. [42].…”
Section: Blended-learning and Mixed Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as suggested by Khine and Lourdusamy (2003), it is important to include an element of face to face instruction in any Blended learning delivery. Participant responses indicated that the face to face component was valuable in supporting the online delivery of learning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%