2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.908911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bleed-through removal in degraded documents

Abstract: This paper presents a linear-based restoration method for bleed-through degraded document images and uses a Bayesian approach for bleed-through reduction. A variation of iterated conditional modes (ICM) optimisation is used whereby samples are drawn for the clean image estimates, whilst the remaining variables are estimated via the mode of their conditional probabilities. The proposed method is tested on various samples of scanned manuscript images with different degrees of degradation, and results visually co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recto sides are depicted in the left and the verso sides in the right, respectively. From top to bottom, we see the original degraded images, the results from the methods in [5,10,18], and [6], respectively, and finally, the results from the method proposed herein. It is apparent that the results obtained with our method are fully qualitatively comparable to the best ones, produced by the method in [6].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The recto sides are depicted in the left and the verso sides in the right, respectively. From top to bottom, we see the original degraded images, the results from the methods in [5,10,18], and [6], respectively, and finally, the results from the method proposed herein. It is apparent that the results obtained with our method are fully qualitatively comparable to the best ones, produced by the method in [6].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a, d. From top to bottom: originals, results from the method in [5], results from the method in [18], results from the method in [10], results from the method in [6], and results from our method image. The values of these indices for the two experiments above are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, performance may be evaluated without any ground truth by quantifying how the restoration affects a secondary step, such as the performance of an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) system on the document image, [17], [16]. A further issue with quantitative evaluations for performance comparison is that results of different methods are often in different formats, such as binary images [1], pseudo-binary images where the background is uniform with varying foreground intensities [10], [8], or a textured background medium with varying foreground and background intensities [17], [11]. We propose that a fair quantitative comparison between methods can only be achieved if they are converted to the same format then compared to a ground truth that is also of the same format, and the simplest way of achieving this is to binarise all the results and compare them to a binary ground truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%