2018
DOI: 10.15199/48.2018.08.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Błędy w pomiarach strumieni objętości zwężką podwójną przy odwrotnym ustawieniu kryz w rurociągu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main part of the water stream was flowing through a measuring pipe (6) (stainless steel with an inner diameter of D = 50 mm), in which a standard orifice with a coefficient β = 0.5 was installed. Dynamic pressure on the orifice was measured with the differential pressure transmitter APR 2000/ ALW (5) programmed with a measuring range of Δp = 2.4 kPa, at which the relative error is 0.15% of the base.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main part of the water stream was flowing through a measuring pipe (6) (stainless steel with an inner diameter of D = 50 mm), in which a standard orifice with a coefficient β = 0.5 was installed. Dynamic pressure on the orifice was measured with the differential pressure transmitter APR 2000/ ALW (5) programmed with a measuring range of Δp = 2.4 kPa, at which the relative error is 0.15% of the base.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of orifices in relation to other solutions are: simple construction, high reliability, ruggedness, the possibility of being used in wide ranges of pressure and temperature and low cost [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%