2017
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blastocyst classification systems used in Latin America: is a consensus possible?

Abstract: Objective: To identify different blastocyst classification systems used by embryologists in Latin American countries and evaluate the possibility of establishing a consensus among these countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We converted various quantitative grades related to other data resources to the Veeck and Zaninovic 38 scoring system before testing our trained algorithm with other clinical resources ( Supplementary Table 3). For instance, the 3AA grade in our WCM-NY dataset is equivalent to the BEaa grade in the Universidad de Valencia dataset and the 4AA grade in the IRDB-IC dataset ( Supplementary Table 5), which is based on the Gardner system 9,24 . Notably, these two datasets are less accurate compared to the WCM-NY dataset due to variations in the grading systems.…”
Section: Appendix A: Embryologists Split and Merge The Quantity Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We converted various quantitative grades related to other data resources to the Veeck and Zaninovic 38 scoring system before testing our trained algorithm with other clinical resources ( Supplementary Table 3). For instance, the 3AA grade in our WCM-NY dataset is equivalent to the BEaa grade in the Universidad de Valencia dataset and the 4AA grade in the IRDB-IC dataset ( Supplementary Table 5), which is based on the Gardner system 9,24 . Notably, these two datasets are less accurate compared to the WCM-NY dataset due to variations in the grading systems.…”
Section: Appendix A: Embryologists Split and Merge The Quantity Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult and challenging to compare selection methodologies and analyze patients undergoing treatments in different clinics. Indeed, attempts to establish a universal grading and selection system have thus far failed to catch on 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, attempts to establish a universal grading and selection system have thus far failed to catch on. 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main morphological parameters analyzed are based on blastocyst stage and, currently, the most wide classification system used is based on morphological parameters graded by Gardner & Schoolcraft (1999) , which involves expansion and hatching (EH) stage, from 1 (the least grade of expansion) to 6 (totally hatched); inner cell mass (ICM) grades, classified from A (many tightly packed cells) to C (very few cells) and trophectoderm (TE) grades, classified from A (many cells forming cohesive epithelium) to C (large and scarce cells). Despite the constant improvement of embryo selection systems, morphological evaluation observed through light microscopy remains the most used in assisted reproduction clinics worldwide ( Alpha & ESHRE, 2011 ; Nasiri & Eftekhari-Yazdi, 2015 ; Puga-Torres et al ., 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%