2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blast wave from a high-pressure gas tank rupture in a fire: Stand-alone and under-vehicle hydrogen tanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blast wave decayed faster along the tank axis (25 percent reduction of overpressure from 83 to 64.8 kPa at 4.2 m). The released mechanical energy was estimated as 7.33 MJ and chemical energy that contributed to the blast wave strength as 10.3 MJ [9]. The maximum reported diameter of the ¦reball was about 7.7 m (at time 45 ms after the tank rupture).…”
Section: Usa Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blast wave decayed faster along the tank axis (25 percent reduction of overpressure from 83 to 64.8 kPa at 4.2 m). The released mechanical energy was estimated as 7.33 MJ and chemical energy that contributed to the blast wave strength as 10.3 MJ [9]. The maximum reported diameter of the ¦reball was about 7.7 m (at time 45 ms after the tank rupture).…”
Section: Usa Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, a theoretical model of fireball diameter after high-pressure hydrogen tank rupture in a fire in the open atmosphere at ground level was published [23]. The model accounted for the observed in experiments' hemispherical rather than spherical shape of a fireball [4].…”
Section: Gaseous Hydrogen Tank Rupture In a Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where e P  is the external overpressure peak, Po is the ambient atmospheric pressure, is the mechanical energy coefficient (Molkov and Kashkarov, 2015). For the vented explosion from the side wall, it is assumed there is no reflection of blast wave from the fully-opened vent.…”
Section: Fig 20 3d View Of Monitors Near the Vent Of The Donor Tank And Data Recording Panel On The Acceptor Tank In Flacs Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%