2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement

Abstract: The rapid increase in the number of new laboratory methods has led to the necessity of reliable verification methods. Validation of a new measurement method for application to medical practice requires comparison with gold standard techniques. The Bland-Altman analysis is a frequently applied technique in studies that investigate the agreement between two methods of the same medical measurement. In this review, potential areas of usage of Bland-Altman analysis is elaborated from a clinical viewpoint, and possi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
111
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…0.0036, 0,0022, 0.0023, 0.0021 and 0.0015 at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-month time scales respectively), hence indicated good agreement between SPI and SPEI at all time scales. Moreover, the test results agreed with [82] which stated that good agreement can be expected if the scattering of points is diminished, and points lie relatively close to the line which represents mean bias. This proved that there existed a good level of agreement since most of the scattering points lie within the upper and lower limits of agreement close to the mean difference of each time scale (see Fig.…”
Section: Degree Of Agreement Between Spi and Speisupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0.0036, 0,0022, 0.0023, 0.0021 and 0.0015 at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-month time scales respectively), hence indicated good agreement between SPI and SPEI at all time scales. Moreover, the test results agreed with [82] which stated that good agreement can be expected if the scattering of points is diminished, and points lie relatively close to the line which represents mean bias. This proved that there existed a good level of agreement since most of the scattering points lie within the upper and lower limits of agreement close to the mean difference of each time scale (see Fig.…”
Section: Degree Of Agreement Between Spi and Speisupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that two methods might have a perfect positive or negative correlation but with no agreement between them. This was reinforced by [54,82], which recommended against the use of correlation as a method for assessing the comparability between methods. Hence, in this study, the PCC results strictly indicate the direction and strength of the linear relationship between SPI and SPEI not the degree of agreement between them.…”
Section: Linear Relationship Between Spi and Speimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary finding of this study was that measured mitochondrial rate constants were equivalent (absence of a meaningful effect) when calculated from a reduced number of data points (Mito6) compared to a full set of data points (Mito22). The conclusions were based on equivalency testing (Lakens, 2017) and Bland-Altman analysis (Altman and Bland, 1983;Dogan, 2018). The results of this study therefore support the validity and repeatability of the Mito6 protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This testing evaluated the mean difference between the two analyses (Mito22 and Mito6/Mito5 * ) and determined the 90% confidence interval for the mean difference and the equivalence bounds which was assumed to be 5% of the mean rate constant values. This approach provides similar analysis outcomes to that for Bland-Altman analyses (Altman and Bland, 1983;Dogan, 2018). Bland-Altman analysis was also performed and the slope and R 2 -values for the rate constants of the data: (Mito22-Mito6)/(Mito22 + Mito6)/2, was performed to evaluate potential changes in agreement with the rate constants and magnitude of the rate constant (Altman and Bland, 1983).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from this example, when evaluating the reliability of the two test measurement results, it is wrong to make conclusions only by looking at the correlation coefficient. In this case, the test that should be preferred is the Bland-Altman analysis, and a compatibility assessment should be made along with the correlation [2]. In our study, which presented the highest number of cases related to BGA and LAA compatibility in the literature, 31060 patient data were examined and although moderate correlation was found for sodium and potassium, and strong correlation was found for hemoglobin, hematocrit and glucose, mean differences were not within acceptable limits for any test.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%