2016
DOI: 10.1093/analys/anw058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blame: Strangers and the Moral Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"(Darwall, 2006, p. 15).7 See also,Betzler (2009).8Scanlon (2008). 9 Accordingly, Scheffler holds that Scanlon's more mature conception of the moral relationship in Moral Dimension does not allay my doubts about the plausibility of construing moral reasons as relationship-dependent reasons in my sense(Scheffler, 2010, p. 124).10 See alsoBrown (2017) for an insightful discussion of this important distinction.11 For further helpful discussion of attitude-dependent versus attitude-independent relationships (seeKolodny, 2003, pp. 148-149).12 For an objection along similar lines, see alsoWallace (2011, p. 361).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"(Darwall, 2006, p. 15).7 See also,Betzler (2009).8Scanlon (2008). 9 Accordingly, Scheffler holds that Scanlon's more mature conception of the moral relationship in Moral Dimension does not allay my doubts about the plausibility of construing moral reasons as relationship-dependent reasons in my sense(Scheffler, 2010, p. 124).10 See alsoBrown (2017) for an insightful discussion of this important distinction.11 For further helpful discussion of attitude-dependent versus attitude-independent relationships (seeKolodny, 2003, pp. 148-149).12 For an objection along similar lines, see alsoWallace (2011, p. 361).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%