“…Such an overabundance is indicative of strongly enhanced dynamical activity in these dense stellar systems, which promotes the formation of a conspicuous number of exotic objects, such as blue straggler stars, X-ray binaries, cataclysmic variables, and MSPs (Bailyn 1992;Cool et al 1995;Ferraro et al 1995Ferraro et al , 2001aFerraro et al , 2015bGrindlay et al 2002;Pooley et al 2003;Ransom et al 2005), which can be used to probe the complex interplay between dynamics and stellar evolution (e.g., Goodman & Hut 1989;Hut et al 1992;Phinney 1992;Ferraro et al 2003bFerraro et al , 2009Ferraro et al , 2012Ferraro et al , 2015aPossenti et al 2003;Verbunt & Freire 2014). In this respect, the study of optical companions to binary MSPs in GCs is of the utmost importance, since it presents the opportunity to gain insights into the impact of dynamical interactions (which are particularly frequent in dense environments) on MSPs and stellar evolution, e.g., favoring binary formation (through tidal captures), binary shrinking (through fly-by), and consequent mass transfer activity, as well as exchange interactions that are able to substitute the original companion that recycled the pulsar, with a new, more or less perturbed, star (see, e.g., Rasio et al 2000;Ferraro et al 2003c;King et al 2003;Sabbi et al 2003aSabbi et al , 2003bBenacquista & Downing 2013;Mucciarelli et al 2013). Moreover, in the case of WD companions, it is possible to estimate the masses and cooling ages of the systems through direct comparison of their properties with stellar evolutionary models (see, e.g., Ferraro et al 2003a;Pallanca et al 2013b), while accurate mass measurements require spectroscopical techniques (e.g., van Kerkwijk et al 1996;Bassa et al 2006;Antoniadis et al 2012Anto...…”