Recently there has been much discussion as to whether old black holes have firewalls at their surfaces that would destroy infalling observers. Though I suspect that a proper handling of nonlocality in quantum gravity may show that firewalls do not exist, it is interesting to consider an extension of the firewall idea to what seems to be the logically possible concept of hyperentropic gravitational hot objects (gravitational fireballs or grireballs for short) that have more entropy than ordinary black holes of the same mass. Here some properties of such grireballs are discussed under various assumptions, such as assuming that their radii and entropies both go as powers of their masses as the one independent parameter, or assuming that their radii depend on both their masses and their entropies as two independent parameters. * Internet address: profdonpage@gmail.com 1 Recently Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski, and Sully [1] have given a provocative argument that suggests that an "infalling observer burns up at the horizon" of a sufficiently old black hole, so that the horizon becomes what they called a "firewall."This paper has elicited a large number of responses, some of which support the firewall idea [2,3,4,5], others of which raise skepticism about it [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], and yet others seem more agnostic [17,18].(Samuel Braunstein has informed me that he and Pirandola andŻyczkowski had written a paper [19] that had earlier derived the identical phenomenon which they called "energetic curtains," but that paper makes rather different assumptions and comes to the conclusion that "the information entering a black hole . . . is only decoded into the outgoing radiation very late in the evaporation," which is in conflict with the conclusions of Hayden and Preskill [20] that "Information deposited prior to the half-way point remains concealed until the half-way point, and then emerges quickly.") I do not yet see a clear resolution of the firewall puzzle, though my tentative intuition is that when the nonlocality of gravity is properly taken into account, a unitary theory of quantum gravity will not give firewalls for typical black holes, no matter how old they are. Some partial indications in that direction are given in [6,9,11,12,13], though I do not think they or any other current papers have yet given a completely proper account. We simply do not know enough about quantum gravity at present to be able to describe quantum black holes correctly.Here I wish to suggest a possibility that, although I personally think is unlikely to be true, seems to be at least logically consistent with what little we do know for certain about quantum gravity: the existence of quasi-stable gravitational objects that have even larger entropies (or number of microstates up to some energy) than black holes. I shall assume that such objects can be formed individually in a unitary theory (e.g., not only by pair production, such as the way an electron-positron pair 2 can be produced from an electromagnetic field when there ar...