2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1603.07569
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black holes and information: A new take on an old paradox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a grave violation if performed on a time slice. However, it is a natural feature of time travel, thus supporting the argument of [17].…”
Section: Scrambling For Informationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a grave violation if performed on a time slice. However, it is a natural feature of time travel, thus supporting the argument of [17].…”
Section: Scrambling For Informationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…There are issues with this rescue attempt. One potential issue is that while the firewall saves monogamy, the cost is that it discards the equivalence principle [16,17]. Moreover, while entanglement is a fragile quantum resource, perfect disentanglement, which takes an entangled state into the direct product of its reduced states…”
Section: Scrambling For Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let |Ψ t=0 be a known quantum state such that predicate function ∈ (|Ψ t=0 , P), where P is the closed linear subspace of H representing proposition P , returns the value which is 1 (or 0). In opposition, given that (under the simplest models of black hole evaporation) state |Ψ t=T is a mixed state that can be treated as a random, unknown pure quantum state [21], predicate ∈ on tuple (|Ψ t=T , P) must return neither true nor false. Consequently, the process (29) implies that the truth values of experimental quantum propositions are lost in black holes:…”
Section: Black Hole Evaporation Implies the Power Over The Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence they conjectured ER=EPR. One can also turn the argument around -any two EPR correlated particles are also connected by some sort of ER bridge (see also [132][133][134][135]).…”
Section: Er=eprmentioning
confidence: 99%