2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black hole mass of central galaxies and cluster mass correlation in cosmological hydro-dynamical simulations

Abstract: Context. The correlations between the properties of the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) and the mass of its central super-massive black hole (SMBH) have been extensively studied from a theoretical and observational angle. More recently, relations connecting the SMBH mass and global properties of the hosting cluster, such as temperature and mass, were observed. Aims. We investigate the correlation between SMBH mass and cluster mass and temperature, their establishment and evolution. We compare their scatter to t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
7
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared the projected halo concentration distributions of the simulated clusters with the observational sample. In addition, the agreement between our simulated sample and the observations in terms of stellar masses of the BCGs and of other massive galaxies has been discussed previously (104,105). The stellar mass function in the Hydrangea simulation suite also matches the observations (94).…”
Section: Number Of Expected Ggsl Eventssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We also compared the projected halo concentration distributions of the simulated clusters with the observational sample. In addition, the agreement between our simulated sample and the observations in terms of stellar masses of the BCGs and of other massive galaxies has been discussed previously (104,105). The stellar mass function in the Hydrangea simulation suite also matches the observations (94).…”
Section: Number Of Expected Ggsl Eventssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They interpret the correlations between the SMBH mass and the hot atmospheres as a consequence of the chaotic cold accretion (CCA) of the gas condensed out of the turbulent X-ray atmosphere onto the central SMBH, whereby sustaining a self-regulated feedback loop. The result is consistent with a numerical study by Bassini et al (2019) who used simulated samples of galaxy clusters obtained from zoom-in simulations to show that SMBH mergers are too rare to establish the observed correlations by means of the central-limit theorem. This line of interpretation embraces the scenario in which the correlations between the central SMBHs and their host galaxy's properties are a direct result of a delicate feedback-regulated interaction between the SMBH and its host galaxy (Silk and Rees 1998;King 2003;Churazov et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In sum, by comparing the different X-ray/optical scaling relations, it has emerged that the extended plasma (collisional) atmospheres seem to play a more fundamental role than small-scale (collisionless) stellar properties in the co-evolution of SMBH and groups. This is further supported by zoom-in cosmological simulations [319][320][321]. On the other hand, the slope (and scatter) of the current cosmological simulations still remain too low when compared with the observations (dotted lines in Figure 16), indicating the need to model more realistic feeding and feedback physics (see Section 4) into the coarse subgrid numerical modules.…”
Section: Co-evolution Between the Igrm And The Central Agnmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The solid curves show the fitted observational relations from Gaspari et al [77] (green; together with the quoted log-normal scatter), Bogdán et al [76] (blue), and the "BCG" subsample of Lakhchaura et al [78] (red). The dashed lines show the predictions of cosmological simulations with AGN feedback (Illustris TNG, Truong et al [321]; DIANOGA, Bassini et al [319]). The gray data points are taken from the sample of Gaspari et al [77], which already included the smaller samples that were used by Bogdán et al [76] and Lakhchaura et al [78].…”
Section: Co-evolution Between the Igrm And The Central Agnmentioning
confidence: 99%