2000
DOI: 10.1086/318174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black Hole Mass Estimates from Reverberation Mapping and from Spatially Resolved Kinematics

Abstract: Black hole (BH) masses that have been measured by reverberation mapping in active galaxies fall significantly below the correlation between bulge luminosity and BH mass determined from spatially resolved kinematics of nearby normal galaxies. This discrepancy has created concern that one or both techniques suffer from systematic errors. We show that BH masses from reverberation mapping are consistent with the recently discovered relationship between BH mass and galaxy velocity dispersion. Therefore the bulge lu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
202
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
202
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaspi et al 2000;Grier et al 2012), or the correlation between black hole mass and host galaxy bulge stellar velocity dispersion (e.g. Gebhardt et al 2000). 12 The observed scaling is flatter than expected from a linear relationship, but this can be explained as a bias due to the fact that we only sample the higher frequency end of the soft lag range in the highest mass objects, which leads to systematically shorter lags than would be seen if we could sample the maximum amplitude of soft lags seen at lower frequencies (De Marco et al 2013).…”
Section: The Iron K Lagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaspi et al 2000;Grier et al 2012), or the correlation between black hole mass and host galaxy bulge stellar velocity dispersion (e.g. Gebhardt et al 2000). 12 The observed scaling is flatter than expected from a linear relationship, but this can be explained as a bias due to the fact that we only sample the higher frequency end of the soft lag range in the highest mass objects, which leads to systematically shorter lags than would be seen if we could sample the maximum amplitude of soft lags seen at lower frequencies (De Marco et al 2013).…”
Section: The Iron K Lagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever they were available, we used the M BH estimates based on the established correlations of the black hole mass with the host galaxy properties (Kormendy & Richstone 1995;Magorrian et al 1998;Gebhardt et al 2000a;Ferrarese & Merritt 2000;Wandel 2002;Marconi & Hunt 2003). In addition, we also used the estimators calibrated from reverberation mapping technique (Gebhardt et al 2000b;Kaspi et al 2000;Vestergaard & Peterson 2006) and, in some cases, the estimates based on spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling (Ghisellini et al 2010). In cases where more than one estimate was found, we adopted the most direct one or the one based on the relation with the least intrinsic scatter.…”
Section: Smbh Masses and Corresponding Time Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…330-458), but there is still much that we do not understand about these exotic objects. The combination of electromagnetic observations with future detections of gravitational-wave (GW) signals will provide key insights into the nature of compact objects and the role they play in some of the most energetic events in the universe: gamma-ray bursts, active galactic nuclei, quasars, etc. (Soltan 1982;Kormendy & Richstone 1995;Magorrian et al 1998;Janka et al 1999;Gebhardt et al 2000;Hughes & Blandford 2003;Peterson et al 2004;Lee & Ramirez-Ruiz 2007;Hughes 2009;Metzger & Berger 2012;Berger 2013;Berger et al 2013;Piran et al 2013;Tanvir et al 2013). Several large-scale collaborations are working to inaugurate the new field of GW astronomy by targeting a wide variety of potential GW sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%