2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.104029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black hole formation from the gravitational collapse of a nonspherical network of structures

Abstract: We examine the gravitational collapse and black hole formation of multiple non-spherical configurations constructed from Szekeres dust models with positive spatial curvature that smoothly match to a Schwarzschild exterior. These configurations are made of an almost spherical central core region surrounded by a network of "pancake-like" overdensities and voids with spatial positions prescribed through standard initial conditions. We show that a full collapse into a focusing singularity, without shell crossings … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is clear that Szekeres I models are still limited: by having a dust source (interpreted as CDM) and being Petrov type D, they belong to the class of 'silent' models in which local observers are unable to exchange information through wavelike effects (either acoustic waves through nonzero non-trivial pressure or gravitational waves by means of the magnetic Weyl tensor). Also, as commented before, the CET proposal only yields a unique effective energy tensor to derive gravitational entropy for spacetimes that are Petrov types D and N. There is still room for further evaluations since a Szekeres I model of multiple overdensities could collapse and form an apparent horizon as shown in [41]. This potentially represents a connection with the more familiar definitions of entropy of a black hole; an issue to be explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is clear that Szekeres I models are still limited: by having a dust source (interpreted as CDM) and being Petrov type D, they belong to the class of 'silent' models in which local observers are unable to exchange information through wavelike effects (either acoustic waves through nonzero non-trivial pressure or gravitational waves by means of the magnetic Weyl tensor). Also, as commented before, the CET proposal only yields a unique effective energy tensor to derive gravitational entropy for spacetimes that are Petrov types D and N. There is still room for further evaluations since a Szekeres I model of multiple overdensities could collapse and form an apparent horizon as shown in [41]. This potentially represents a connection with the more familiar definitions of entropy of a black hole; an issue to be explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is clear that Szekeres I models are still limited: by having a dust source (interpreted as CDM) and being Petrov type D, they belong to the class of "silent" models in which local observers are unable to exchange information through wavelike effects (either acoustic waves through nonzero nontrivial pressure or gravitational waves by means of the Magnetic Weyl tensor). Also, as commented before, the CET proposal only yields a unique effective energy tensor to derive gravitational entropy for spacetimes that are Petrov types D and N. There is still room for further evaluations since a Szekeres I model of multiple overdensities could collapse and form an apparent horizon as shown in [35]. This potentially represents a connection with the more familiar definitions of entropy of a black hole; an issue to be explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notice that as the evolution proceeds the density contrast at the surrounding wall increases, reaching probably a shellcrossing singularity. We interpret this as the onset of an intricate virialization process, a stage of structure formation that marks the limit of validity of the dust model, and that lies beyond the scope of this work (discussed elsewhere in the literature [83,84]). Since our purpose is to look at the simultaneous evolution of the matter-energy components (CDM and baryons) within the void before the onset of virialization, we have chosen z = 23 as the initial time slice, simply because it is easier to set the initial conditions at this time than at, say,…”
Section: Evolution Of Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%