2007
DOI: 10.1355/sj22-1a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black Areas: Urban Kampongs and Power Relations in Post-war Singapore Historiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Clancey (2003) and Loh (2007) are rare exceptions that see the colonial beginnings of Singapore’s housing programme as consequential. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Clancey (2003) and Loh (2007) are rare exceptions that see the colonial beginnings of Singapore’s housing programme as consequential. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hack and Margolin (2010), for example, feel that Singapore history should be viewed as a series of discontinuities rather than a story of linear progress. Other historians have, mostly recently, also produced work that moves beyond the mainstream (Aljunied, 2009; Barr & Trocki, 2007; Dobbs, 2003; Loh, 2007; Warren, 1986, 1993). Similarly, there are other ways of dividing Philippine history, and perhaps the divisions are not so useful to begin with.…”
Section: Alternative Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1961, they housed some 200,000-250,000 mostly low-income people out of a population of 1.7 million (HDB AR, 1961, p. 4). They were the strategic sites of contestation between the state and society in postwar Singapore and officially viewed to be 'black areas' (Loh, 2007). The term was central to the discourse of 'squatter' clearance employed by the HDB and its colonial predecessor, the Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT).…”
Section: 'Insanitary Congested and Dangerous': Representing The Urbamentioning
confidence: 99%