1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018818906559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of Pt on S segregation in b-NiAl has also been investigated, and Pt was found to reduce S segregation to the free surface [18][19][20] and even eliminate S at the interface [18]. Hf, a reactive element, is expected to reduce, if not eliminate, S segregation to the interface, as has been found for Zr in Fe 3 Al [21] and Y in FeCrAl [22][23][24]. Hf has been shown to segregate to the Al 2 O 3 /NiAl interface (K. L. More, private communication, unpublished results), but whether it stops S segregation has yet to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of Pt on S segregation in b-NiAl has also been investigated, and Pt was found to reduce S segregation to the free surface [18][19][20] and even eliminate S at the interface [18]. Hf, a reactive element, is expected to reduce, if not eliminate, S segregation to the interface, as has been found for Zr in Fe 3 Al [21] and Y in FeCrAl [22][23][24]. Hf has been shown to segregate to the Al 2 O 3 /NiAl interface (K. L. More, private communication, unpublished results), but whether it stops S segregation has yet to be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, little sulfur segregation at the scale/coating interface occurs, but due to the limitation of the SEM sensitivity, it is difficult to detect the existence of such sulfur segregation. It is true that sulfur segregation, at monolayer thickness, but up to 50% concentration, are typically demonstrated by some highly sensitive, surface- analytical techniques, such as Auger [11][12][13][14][16][17] and XPS, 15 rather than EDS over the years. Smeggil et al 8 reported a small interfacial sulfur peak on a 10-20 ppm sulfur alloy by scanning-electron-microprobe techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many researchers in hightemperature oxidation of metals have focused their attention on sulfur segregation at the interface between thermally grown Al 2 O 3 scales and various heat-resisting alloys including Fe-Cr-Al and Ni-Cr-Al. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Many studies support the proposed ''the sulfur-effect'' model, including some indirect results showing that sulfur removal from an alloy by H 2 -annealing greatly improves the oxide-scale adhesion. [18][19][20][21][22] Smialek has suggested that for single-crystal superalloys the sulfur content should be lower than 0.2 ppm to maximize scale adhesion for a 1 mm-thick sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzed areas are oxide imprints, and segregation could only have happened before the separation. Using Auger electron spectroscopy, Tolpygo and Viefhaus [19] also detected S at an intact FeCrAl/Al 2 O 3 interface, with a coverage of 50 at.%. According to these authors, the driving force of this segregation is plastic stress and strain to the interface.…”
Section: Adherence Loss At An Intact Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%