2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010345123670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such different lines of defences would support the defensive synergism hypothesis, which states that different defence traits expressed in combination may provide a higher level of resistance against herbivory than when expressed separately [22]. Examples to support this hypothesis have been found in Nicotiana attenuata [52], in rainforest shrubs of Piper cenocladum [9] and in different Umbelliferae species [53]. Multiple defence traits may be adaptive in a complex plant-herbivore-carnivore community, because of the redundancy of defence lines; when one resistance trait fails, another acts as a safety net [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such different lines of defences would support the defensive synergism hypothesis, which states that different defence traits expressed in combination may provide a higher level of resistance against herbivory than when expressed separately [22]. Examples to support this hypothesis have been found in Nicotiana attenuata [52], in rainforest shrubs of Piper cenocladum [9] and in different Umbelliferae species [53]. Multiple defence traits may be adaptive in a complex plant-herbivore-carnivore community, because of the redundancy of defence lines; when one resistance trait fails, another acts as a safety net [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition, plant infochemicals may function as an indirect defence trait responsible for attracting natural enemies of herbivores [2,3]. However, a direct defence may not only have a major effect on the herbivore's survival, but also on the survival of the natural enemies of the herbivore, leading to a possible conflict between the plant and the natural enemy that is attracted to the herbivore on that plant [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Evolutionary theory thus suggests that defence strategies, such as direct and indirect defences, may negatively correlate within a multitrophic community resulting in possible trade-offs [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous studies have tested for potential trade-offs among ant-mediated and direct plant defences, their results have been mixed. Some studies reported reduced chemical defences in myrmecophytic plants [4,5], whereas no trade-offs between ant-mediated and direct defence were found by others [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Production of these rewards can be costly to the plants [2], and Janzen [3] was the first to propose that plants which evolved symbiosis with ants might reduce their allocation to direct defences such as toxic chemicals because maintenance of both antmediated and direct defences is redundant and costly. In addition, some chemical defences may have negative effects on ants as well [4,5]. Although numerous studies have tested for potential trade-offs among ant-mediated and direct plant defences, their results have been mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These herbivores may gain important benefits from using ant-occupied plants as hosts, including enemy-free space, reduced competition, and access to food sources produced by the plant as a reward for the ant mutualists. Furthermore, the leaf tissues of ant-defended plants often have lower levels of chemical defenses relative to unoccupied plants [19][21], and thus are likely to be more palatable to herbivores. Gaining access to ant-defended plants requires specialized traits that reduce ant attack rates or increase tolerance to attack, and past evidence has suggested a variety of possible traits may serve this function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%