2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009562531188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Culturally, age is a crucial component of identity, and more precise age estimates can help to unpack the relationship between biological development, understandings of personhood, and cultural rites of passage (Kamp 2001;Tung & Knudson 2010;Waterman & Thomas 2011). The two most common strategies for estimating the age of subadults using the dentition are dental eruption (e.g.…”
Section: Developmentally-ambiguous Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturally, age is a crucial component of identity, and more precise age estimates can help to unpack the relationship between biological development, understandings of personhood, and cultural rites of passage (Kamp 2001;Tung & Knudson 2010;Waterman & Thomas 2011). The two most common strategies for estimating the age of subadults using the dentition are dental eruption (e.g.…”
Section: Developmentally-ambiguous Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more general and abbreviated the actions in play, the more deeply they reflect the meaning, goal and system of relationships in adult activity that is being recreated. (Elkonin, 2005b, p. 40) Recent cross-cultural studies (Kamp, 2001) confirm Elkonin's (2005) suggestion that children model substantial aspects of their play on adult activities. It is in the context of understanding play not only as a universal but also as a culturally mediated phenomenon, in which the environment influences the themes of the play, that we discuss the impact of objects on the content of the rolesthe human activities, work and human interactions in their everyday reality that are reproduced in play.…”
Section: Play As 'Social Practice' and The Role Of Objectsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is in the context of understanding play not only as a universal but also as a culturally mediated phenomenon, in which the environment influences the themes of the play, that we discuss the impact of objects on the content of the rolesthe human activities, work and human interactions in their everyday reality that are reproduced in play. Kamp's (2001) study brings insight into our understanding of the reciprocal nature of the relationship between culture and play: through engaging in play activities, children learn social roles and (typical) cultural values and norms, and through the creativity and innovative problem solving that occur in play, the new generation contributes to further development of the (given) culture. Provided that different objects associated with different types of human activities have different functional values, the question becomes: What kind of features should the environment have in order to support such activities?…”
Section: Play As 'Social Practice' and The Role Of Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second line of research was inspired by the 1970s feminist movements, evolving with 1990s theories of gender relationships to societal roles and visibility. A major interest was directed towards those population groups usually defined as "invisible", moving the child from a strictly feminine dimension to a more active position in the society; the little ones started to be considered parts of the social life, actively contributing to the modification of their environment (Lillehammer, 1989;Derevenski, 1994;Baker, 1997;Lander, 1998;Kamp, 2001). In particular, Lillehammer (1989) was one of the first authors focusing on the role of children in archaeology, suggesting a multidisciplinary use of funerary archaeology, ethnography and osteology as means for understanding the complex connections between children, adults and the physical environment (Lillehammer, 1989, p. 89).…”
Section: Brief History Of the Archaeological And Bioanthropological Study Of Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refinement of globally-used methodologies and the development of more accurate techniques for age estimation in children is an enduring research topic in bioarchaeology; the creation of narrower age ranges allows for more detailed paleodemographic reconstructions that are beneficial for the interpretation of the life and health conditions of a whole population (Halcrow & Tayles, 2008, p. 208). The biological age estimated from the skeleton must not be confused with the social age of the individuals, which was societally imposed in different periods and communities, and often strikingly different from the concept of childhood we have today (Kamp, 2001;Baxter, 2005;Halcrow & Tayles, 2008). However, the ability to place individuals within more accurate age categories also allows a deeper understanding of their position in the community.…”
Section: Future Prospects and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%