2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024821918002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum and minimum limiting currents for opposite positions of a horizontal surface during electrodeposition of copper differ threefold [10]. The limiting currents of the triiodide reduction in the same conditions depend on the electrolyte composition and differ by 2-2.9 times [12]. Altering the vertical electrode position during the anodic electropolishing of copper to a horizontal, directed downward, makes the limiting current rise by 1.5 times [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum and minimum limiting currents for opposite positions of a horizontal surface during electrodeposition of copper differ threefold [10]. The limiting currents of the triiodide reduction in the same conditions depend on the electrolyte composition and differ by 2-2.9 times [12]. Altering the vertical electrode position during the anodic electropolishing of copper to a horizontal, directed downward, makes the limiting current rise by 1.5 times [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting diffusion current of the cathodic process is minimum on a cathode facing down. The current alters with the tilt angle and is maximum on a cathode whose plane is facing up [9][10][11][12]. With the anodic process the situation is exactly the opposite: the limiting diffusion current is maximum on an anode facing down [9,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%