2015 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/csci.2015.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BL-LDA: Bringing Bigram to Supervised Topic Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, [1] propose to enhance topic modeling by enable a system to dynamically search for word concurrence text that are significant to identifying a target word. Phrase-based system using this new strategy BL LDA incorporates the bigram concept for supervised generative modeling for multilabel text input.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, [1] propose to enhance topic modeling by enable a system to dynamically search for word concurrence text that are significant to identifying a target word. Phrase-based system using this new strategy BL LDA incorporates the bigram concept for supervised generative modeling for multilabel text input.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quality term in the topic of interest indicates a notion, idea, approach, or procedure. A number of applications require the mining of high-quality phrases [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process becomes complex when interpreting the relations between words, because such models do not capture the different meanings of words in context (polysemy). Due to the problems associated with LDA, we resorted to Bringing Bigram to Supervised Topic Model (BL-LDA) [32], which is a supervised generative model for multi-labeled text, that actually extends LDA by applying the bigram concept. Accordingly, this approach can be used as proposed in Algorithm 4.…”
Section: Linguistic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%