2019
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivariate semiparametric control charts for simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variance

Abstract: In the present article, two semiparametric bivariate control charts are presented, which use order statistics and are effective in jointly monitoring of possible shifts in the process mean and/or variance. To achieve that both the median location (or more generally the location of a specific order statistic) and the number of specific observations of the test sample lying between the control limits are taken into account. The false alarm rate and the in‐control average run length are not affected by the margin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the trace only considers variance, and the determinant cannot detect structural changes in the covariance, only changes in scale. Some methods focus on bivariate data, having only two variances and one covariance to monitor, but these approaches do not scale to higher dimensional data and require an assumption of the normality of the observations 6,15,16 . Recent multivariate control charts for covariances tend to focus on either MCUSUM or MEWMA methods, such as Bodnar and Schmid, 17 who develop MCUSUM control charts for autocorrelated processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the trace only considers variance, and the determinant cannot detect structural changes in the covariance, only changes in scale. Some methods focus on bivariate data, having only two variances and one covariance to monitor, but these approaches do not scale to higher dimensional data and require an assumption of the normality of the observations 6,15,16 . Recent multivariate control charts for covariances tend to focus on either MCUSUM or MEWMA methods, such as Bodnar and Schmid, 17 who develop MCUSUM control charts for autocorrelated processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods focus on bivariate data, having only two variances and one covariance to monitor, but these approaches do not scale to higher dimensional data and require an assumption of the normality of the observations. 6,15,16 Recent multivariate control charts for covariances tend to focus on either MCUSUM or MEWMA methods, such as Bodnar and Schmid, 17 who develop MCUSUM control charts for autocorrelated processes. These MCUSUM charts assume normality, but they are not limited to bivariate data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, according to the simulation results, the performance of SS-CUSUM and DD-CUSUM control charts is better than traditional CUSUM charts. For more research on nonparametric multivariate control charts, we cite Koutras and Sofikitou, 30 Koutras and Triantafyllou, 31 Mahmood and Erem, 32 Xie and Qiu, 33 and Zhou and Qiu. 34 This study proposes a CUSUM control chart relying on bivariate exceedance statistics for observing the shifts in location parameters in bivariate manufacturing processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, according to the simulation results, the performance of SS‐CUSUM and DD‐CUSUM control charts is better than traditional CUSUM charts. For more research on nonparametric multivariate control charts, we cite Koutras and Sofikitou, 30 Koutras and Triantafyllou, 31 Mahmood and Erem, 32 Xie and Qiu, 33 and Zhou and Qiu 34 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yen et al 15 suggested a control chart for monitoring multivariate process dispersion. Koutras and Sofikitou 16 proposed a bivariate semiparametric control chart to monitor the process mean and variance simultaneously. Sparks 17 proposed a Hotelling T 2 to monitor a highly correlated multivariate process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%