2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivariate Extension of the Quadrature Method of Moments for Modeling Simultaneous Coagulation and Sintering of Particle Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
190
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
190
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires either some a priori assumptions regarding the PSDF or a suitable closure scheme. One closure scheme for the moment equations involves quadrature-based methods (McGraw 1997;Wright et al 2001;Marchisio and Fox 2005). Another type of closure is interpolative, as proposed by Frenklach and Harris (1987), hence the name MOMIC (Frenklach 2002).…”
Section: Methods Of Moments With Interpolative Closure (Momic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires either some a priori assumptions regarding the PSDF or a suitable closure scheme. One closure scheme for the moment equations involves quadrature-based methods (McGraw 1997;Wright et al 2001;Marchisio and Fox 2005). Another type of closure is interpolative, as proposed by Frenklach and Harris (1987), hence the name MOMIC (Frenklach 2002).…”
Section: Methods Of Moments With Interpolative Closure (Momic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the DSM approach remains prohibitively expensive for turbulent combustion simulation. Finally, as a reasonable compromise between fidelity and computational efficiency, the method of moments (Dobbins and Mulholland 1984;Frenklach 1985;Frenklach and Harris 1987;McGraw 1997;Wright et al 2001;Frenklach 2002;Moody and Collins 2003;Lignell et al 2008;Mueller et al 2009a,b) describes the key soot variables and the size distribution information by solving for a subset of moments of the PSDF, which are transported along with the gas-phase species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using only one moment in size gives a simplified model which yields low computational cost but is not able to take into account the evaporation phenomenon since it provides no information on the mean size of the droplets. Therefore, some methods using several moments in size have been developed, allowing a more accurate description of the spray's physical behaviour (see for example [1][2][3][4]32,41]). The multi-fluid approach is based on a different point of view, which consists in first discretizing the size space before performing any average in size.…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, breakup and coalescence cannot be taken into account in the standard two-fluid approach where only two moments in size of the distribution function are resolved (droplet number and droplet mass density). Some other Moment Methods have been developed (see for example [1,2,32,41]) and recently, Beck and Watkins proposed a real improvement on this kind of method, based on conservation equations for several droplet size moments allowing the development of spray submodels and the possibility to take into account some complex phenomena such as heat transfer, breakup and collision [3,4]. However, such a method still needs to presuppose a global shape for the whole size distribution of the spray, introducing some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is sometimes possible to solve the multivariate version of eq 6 for a selected set of multivariate moments by employing a nonlinear equation solver. 24 The success of such an approach will be dependent, in part, on whether the weights and abscissas are uniquely determined by the chosen set of moments. Indeed, unlike in the univariate case, there is no guarantee in the multivariate case that the weights will be non-negative and the abscissas realizable for a particular choice of moments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%