2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13203-016-0146-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bitumen heavy oil upgrading by cavitation processing: effect on asphaltene separation, rheology, and metal content

Abstract: Cavitation processing has been proposed as a greener alternative to solvent dilution or heat treatment of bitumen and other heavy oils to reduce viscosity and hence, improve transportability. The effect of acoustic cavitation under different conditions of sonication frequencies (lowto high-frequency range) and power inputs on asphaltene content, rheological changes, and metal content of bitumen was investigated in this study. Ultrasonic treatment resulted in a decrease in asphaltene content in bitumen that lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 a). Similar results were reported by Mohapatra and Kirpalani (2016), who argued that sonicating a Canadian Bitumen at a frequency as high as 378 kHz could lower the viscosity of the oil up to 15% from its original value [28] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 a). Similar results were reported by Mohapatra and Kirpalani (2016), who argued that sonicating a Canadian Bitumen at a frequency as high as 378 kHz could lower the viscosity of the oil up to 15% from its original value [28] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As per the same author, the primary challenge is the relatively limited range of ultrasonic radiation (up to 2 m) at the operational resonance frequency, which usually ranges from 20 to 40 kHz [26] . This is to say that this method still suffer from deeper understanding to make meaningful and consistent scientific elaborations despite the wealth of papers covering the topic [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical effects are recognised to be dominant at low frequency (Suslick et al 1999), while physical effects are dominant at high frequency as it requires very high energy input to generate cavitation at high frequencies. Change in viscosity occurs due to intense shear or tensile force within the fluid (Mohapatra and Kirpalani 2016). This shear is caused by physical effects such as microconvection, and microstreaming or microstirring.…”
Section: Effect Of Cavitation Yield On Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sonication treatment of asphalt can decrease the H/C ratio under different power inputs and frequencies. Characterization of asphaltene revealed that reduced or retarded asphaltene formation can lower the metal content in bitumen [26]. Flannigan & Suslick [31] discovered the sonoluminescence of a single bubble in sulfuric acid, and plasma was detected during the cavitating process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, when the frequency is relatively high, the physical effects surpass the chemical impacts, and tiny emulsion droplets are visible between an immiscible interface that lowers or eliminates the resistance of mass transfer [25]. The tensile force or shear effect caused by physical effects can reduce the fluid viscosity [26,27]. AC has a relatively wide application among industries, with the disadvantage of a high power requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%