2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03510-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bit Threads and Holographic Monogamy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
158
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end having a framework that allows for efficient exploration of this object is a necessary first step. We will already see a few glimpses of patterns towards the end of our discussion (see also earlier comments in [] and more recent work []), but we hope to make clear that there is more information to be mined here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To this end having a framework that allows for efficient exploration of this object is a necessary first step. We will already see a few glimpses of patterns towards the end of our discussion (see also earlier comments in [] and more recent work []), but we hope to make clear that there is more information to be mined here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…See [] which generalize the RT‐based proof of SSA . Two further (distinct) proofs of MMI based on the ‘bit thread’ reformulation of holographic entanglement entropy recently appeared in [].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These new inequalities were the result of a search algorithm which unfortunately does not provide a systematic way to derive new ones, nor does it suggest an interpretation for their significance in the holographic context. An interesting suggestion in this direction was recently put forth in [], which used arguments based on the bit‐thread interpretation of the RT formula to conjecture a particular decomposition of geometric states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, argues that the techniques of [] cannot be employed for the proof of the five (or more) party inequalities of [] in dynamical situations . A rigorous proof of the inequalities of [], and possibly new inequalities for N5 which can emerge from our framework, will therefore require some new technology (perhaps based on bit‐threads, as suggested by the new proofs of MMI given in []). However, the fact that the notion of primitive quantities, and therefore the full holographic entropy arrangement, is insensitive to the distinction between static and dynamical spacetimes, lends support to the intuition that the RT and HRT holographic entropy cones may in fact coincide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%