2001
DOI: 10.1088/0959-7174/11/2/301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bistatic scattering and depolarization by randomly rough surfaces: application to the natural rough surfaces in X-band

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we study the case of one-dimensional rough sea surface (clean sea surface without pollutants). By using the numerical FBM method, we realize the numerical simulation of the bistatic scattering coefficients (in forward propagation configuration) of clean rough sea surface, and we compare the numerical results with those obtained by using the asymptotic models such as small perturbation method (SPM) [7,24]. This step will allow to validate the results obtained by the developed model, and to have a reference on an ocean surface without oil spills.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Bistatic Scattering Of Contaminated Romentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we study the case of one-dimensional rough sea surface (clean sea surface without pollutants). By using the numerical FBM method, we realize the numerical simulation of the bistatic scattering coefficients (in forward propagation configuration) of clean rough sea surface, and we compare the numerical results with those obtained by using the asymptotic models such as small perturbation method (SPM) [7,24]. This step will allow to validate the results obtained by the developed model, and to have a reference on an ocean surface without oil spills.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Bistatic Scattering Of Contaminated Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, on one hand, different models based on the geometric description of the sea surface (Elfouhaily spectrum and Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum) [5,6] and on the other hand, different electromagnetic models have been developed for studying the electromagnetic scattering from sea surface. The existing electromagnetic models are classified into: approximate methods like the Kirchhoff Approximation (KA), Small Perturbation Method (SPM), Two Scale Model (TSM), Small Slope Approximation (SSA) [7][8][9] and exact methods such as the finite difference time domain (FDTD) [10], Finite Element Method (FEM) [11], Method of Moment (MoM) [12], Forward-Backward Method (FBM), Forward- Backward Method with Spectral Accelerate Algorithm (FBM/SAA) [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the Bragg scattering (scattering of linear waves) has been well studied in many papers [2] [3] [4]. Other works and measures on rough surfaces observed in bistatic configuration were performed on stamp of soil with different textures, including allowing the estimation of parameters of natural surfaces from measurements made in an anechoic chamber [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenomena add a component which is not negligible and which is called the non-Bragg diffusion in the total diffusion coefficients. Then in this case, it can be written: σ = σ Bragg + σ Non-Bragg (1) To date, the Bragg scattering (scattering of linear waves) has been well studied in many papers [1][2][3]. However, there exists research concerning the non-Bragg scattering only in the mono-static case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion of the breaking waves used in this study is more complicated than the rough surfaces because of their complex form. Consequently, this type of surface phenomena cannot be treated by the approximate methods such as KA, SPM, SSA, TSM, WCA [1][2][3]. We will begin the calculation the scattering of breaking waves by using numerical methods such as the method of the FBM technique (forward-backward) developed by Holliday et al [7] which gives good results even for multiple profiles (such as breaking waves).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%