Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05.
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2005.1525296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bistatic fixed-receiver parasitic SAR processor based on the back-propagation algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the azimuth aliasing problem, the spatial variances of GTLR-BiSAR data need to be solved. For the GTLR-BiSAR system, the time-varying relative positions of the GEO transmitter and LEO receivers bring about the following inconvenience: the targets with the same minimal bistatic ranges, but different azimuth positions, have different range cell migrations (RCMs) and different Doppler frequency modulation (FM) rates [11,22]. This is because the targets confined in the same minimal range gate differ from each other in the minimal LEO range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the azimuth aliasing problem, the spatial variances of GTLR-BiSAR data need to be solved. For the GTLR-BiSAR system, the time-varying relative positions of the GEO transmitter and LEO receivers bring about the following inconvenience: the targets with the same minimal bistatic ranges, but different azimuth positions, have different range cell migrations (RCMs) and different Doppler frequency modulation (FM) rates [11,22]. This is because the targets confined in the same minimal range gate differ from each other in the minimal LEO range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the relative position of the transmitter and receiver in this configuration changes with time, and the Range Cell Migration (RCM) and Doppler FM rate only depend on the moving station, so imaging for this kind of BiSAR is rather different from monostatic SAR and other bistatic configurations. Existing algorithms in wavenumber domain [4]- [5] mostly suit for the translational invariant configuration and cannot be used in one-stationary case. The back-projection (BP) algorithm [6] can serve most cases, but its low efficiency makes it not a good choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This BiSAR not only inherits the advantage of the general BiSAR system, but also is relatively easy to build and implement imaging, so it has gained wide attention these years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One‐stationary bistatic synthetic aperture radar (OS‐BiSAR) is an azimuth‐variant bistatic SAR (BiSAR) system, which has a moving transmitter (or receiver) and a stationary receiver (or transmitter) fixed at the top of a high tower or mountain. This BiSAR not only inherits the advantage of the general BiSAR system, but also is relatively easy to build and implement imaging, so it has gained wide attention these years [1–7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation