1976
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740876003683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bispyridine adduct of cobalt(II) mercury(II) tetrathiocyanate

Abstract: Abstract. Monoclinic, C2~c, a=11.459 (6), b= 13.293 (7), c=14.498 (7) A, fl=105.65 (3) °, Z=4 C14H10CoHgN6S4 formula units per cell, Dc=2-030, Do=2.02 (1) g cm -3. The crystal consists of an infinite three-dimensional framework of HgS4 tetrahedra and trans-CoN4 (pyridine)2 octahedra connected via bridging SCN groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To organize these lantern units into extended geometries, we sought an asymmetric, hard–soft ambidentate and/or bridging candidate L that would link these lanterns in a pseudo-1D array. Thiocyanate has previously been shown to bridge metal centers into 1D, 2D, and 3D arrays and has been used as a terminal axial ligand for lantern complexes, including homometallic Cr and Ru , cores, a trinuclear {FeCr 2 } species, and extended metal atom chains (EMACs). The same hard–soft interactions that ensure homoleptic coordination in our lantern complexes should facilitate directional binding in a 1D system with the harder 3 d metal favoring coordination to N and the softer Pt favoring coordination to S, producing a repeating {PtM-NCS} unit. The two monothiocarboxylate lantern compounds related by a redox couple and ligand rearrangement, namely (PPN)­[PtNi­(tba) 4 Cl] and [ClPtNi­(tba) 4 (OH 2 )], were studied .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To organize these lantern units into extended geometries, we sought an asymmetric, hard–soft ambidentate and/or bridging candidate L that would link these lanterns in a pseudo-1D array. Thiocyanate has previously been shown to bridge metal centers into 1D, 2D, and 3D arrays and has been used as a terminal axial ligand for lantern complexes, including homometallic Cr and Ru , cores, a trinuclear {FeCr 2 } species, and extended metal atom chains (EMACs). The same hard–soft interactions that ensure homoleptic coordination in our lantern complexes should facilitate directional binding in a 1D system with the harder 3 d metal favoring coordination to N and the softer Pt favoring coordination to S, producing a repeating {PtM-NCS} unit. The two monothiocarboxylate lantern compounds related by a redox couple and ligand rearrangement, namely (PPN)­[PtNi­(tba) 4 Cl] and [ClPtNi­(tba) 4 (OH 2 )], were studied .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are several coloured bimetallic mercury derivatives, purple (Cu(ll) [152]), yellow(Cu(l) [153]andFe(ll) [154]), and a pink-red (Co(ll) [155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163]). Herethiocyanate groups serve as bridges between Hg(ll) and the transition metal using the soft and hard ends respectively, giving zig-zag chains.…”
Section: Heteropolynuclear Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several decades, metal–pseudohalide complexes have been extensively studied with respect to the incorporation of neutral nitrogen-donor ligands, such as pyridine derivatives and polyamines, in the coordination sphere of a metal ion. , In view of the negative charge that accompanies the binding of pseudohalides to a metal ion, it is difficult to attach one or more anionic carboxylate groups into the assembly of a metal carboxylate pseudohalide system. Mixed-ligand complexes of this type may conceivably be achieved by using neutral zwitterionic ligands containing carboxylato oxygen donors, such as amino acids and betaine derivatives, instead of anionic carboxylates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%