2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-021-02226-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisphenol A Adsorption from Aqueous Solution Using Graphene Oxide-Alginate Beads

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the mC18/Pa/Alg bead could not easily adsorb the protonated analytes because hydrogen bonding between analytes and bead was reduced. Additionally, excess H + ions in the solution could combine with COO − and compete with the analytes for adsorption on the surface sites of the bead, 17 and extraction recoveries decreased. In the basic condition (pH 9), more OH − was available to disrupt adsorption, and since this pH is close to the p K a of the analytes, neutral analytes could start deprotonating to anions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the mC18/Pa/Alg bead could not easily adsorb the protonated analytes because hydrogen bonding between analytes and bead was reduced. Additionally, excess H + ions in the solution could combine with COO − and compete with the analytes for adsorption on the surface sites of the bead, 17 and extraction recoveries decreased. In the basic condition (pH 9), more OH − was available to disrupt adsorption, and since this pH is close to the p K a of the analytes, neutral analytes could start deprotonating to anions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BET surface area of the mC18/Pa/Alg bead was 153.11 m 2 g −1 , notably higher than other reported alginate beads (2.16-32.20 m 2 g −1 ). 17,27,28 This difference could be due to the synthesis process and precursor applied. The BJH pore volume of 0.29 cm 3 g −1 and average pore diameter of 7.69 nm conrmed that the bead obtained in this work was of the mesoporous class (2 nm < pore size < 50 nm).…”
Section: Preparation Of Real Water Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In view of the economical aspects and environmental benign; adsorption is more suitable process for water treatment comparing with the mentioned techniques [11,12]. Numerous adsorbents such as carbon based materials, silica gel, chelating resins, and fibers, have been applied in mercury adsorption process [13][14][15][16][17][18]. In spite of worthiness of the most mentioned adsorbents in literature some of them show weaknesses like low capacity and high equilibrium time causes low desire to choose them for water treatment hence it is quite necessary to develop novel adsorption based plane for water treatment [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%