This article has a companion Counterpoint by Subklewe. Despite significant advances in treatment regimens and outcomes in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), long-term survival remains poor for the 15% to 20% of pediatric patients and 50% of adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease. 1-3 The emergence of immunotherapeutic strategies that use B-cell antigen-targeted single-chain variable fragments to direct T cells to specific surface antigens on BALL cells has revolutionized outcomes. These strategies include the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel. 4 Even though both therapies target CD19, outcomes vary significantly. We discuss considerations and potential benefits of the preferential use of CAR T-cell therapy over BiTE in r/r BALL , which can serve as a framework for evaluation of approaches with alternative antigen-targeting strategies. Efficacy of CAR vs BiTE: response rates, trafficking, and durability In the phase 2/3 trials leading to the FDA approval of blinatumomab in 2014, the objective response rate to blinatumomab in adult patients was 36% to 44%. Of those achieving a complete remission (CR), 63% to 88% had a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission. 5-9 Importantly, of 70 pediatric patients evaluated, 39% achieved CR with only 14 (20%) being MRD negative. 10 Despite an improvement over responses with conventional salvage chemotherapy, as well as improved response rates for those with MRD-level disease, 11 results of the blinatumomab phase 2/3 and retrospective adult trials indicate that a significant portion of patients are resistant to blinatumomab (Table 1). 12