“…Low and Cowan (1963) described a technique using a conventional microtome for pieces embedded in paraffin, which have been used with small modifications by authors such as Gilbert (1966), Boozer (1969), Lockard (1972) or Thomas and Bandy (1973). However, because of the time‐consuming process and problems associated with paraffin embedment, such a histological technique is not commonly used nowadays, more common being the freezing microtome‐based technique, both for ungulates (Szabik, 1973; Miller, 1974; Pascal and Castanet, 1978; Rice, 1980; Quéré and Pascal, 1983; Klevezal and Pucek, 1987; Moore et al, 1995), and for carnivores (Sauer et al, 1966; Harris, 1978; Zapata et al, 1995, 1997; Garcíaperea and Baquero, 1999). Nevertheless, while the freezing microtome produces cuts between 15‐ and 20‐µm thick; the conventional microtome can produce preparations as thin as 4 or 5 µm.…”