1981
DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.81-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisoniana LXXVIII. Some aspects of urea metabolism in North American bison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peden et al (1974) hypothesized that bison may be capable of more efficient digestion of low-quality forages than cattle due to urea recycling from body pools. Keith et al (1981) substantiated that bison urea metabolism responds to dietary N levels. The results of our study do not completely support the hypothesis that bison have the abil-ity to digest lower quality forages better than cattle.…”
Section: Forage Digestibility and Diet Qualitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Peden et al (1974) hypothesized that bison may be capable of more efficient digestion of low-quality forages than cattle due to urea recycling from body pools. Keith et al (1981) substantiated that bison urea metabolism responds to dietary N levels. The results of our study do not completely support the hypothesis that bison have the abil-ity to digest lower quality forages better than cattle.…”
Section: Forage Digestibility and Diet Qualitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lewis [38] observed urea-nitrogen concentrations from 15-36 mg/dl in orally collected saliva and this result is agreed with the finding of this study and urea also enters the rumen in saliva and the mechanism of urea transfer from blood to saliva is apparently passive diffusion, as the saliva urea concentration is proportional to BUN. Edward et al [46] demonstrated that BUN and salivary urea concentrations were highly correlated (r = 0.96). In this study the salivary creatinine concentrations were about 66% of serum concentrations and the concentrations were related, while salivary creatinine concentrations were 10-15% of serum creatinine concentrations in healthy populations and the concentrations were not related in healthy populations, however, a significant relationship was found in the patients (r = 0.784, P < 0.001) [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%