2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/l38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bismuth germanate coupled to near ultraviolet silicon photomultipliers for time-of-flight PET

Abstract: Bismuth germanate (BGO) was a very attractive scintillator in early-generation positron emission tomography (PET) scanners. However, the major disadvantages of BGO are lower light yield and longer rise and decay time compared to currently popular scintillators such as LSO and LYSO. This results in poorer coincidence timing resolution and it has generally been assumed that BGO is not a suitable scintillator for time-of-flight (TOF) PET applications. However, when a 511-keV photon interacts in a scintillator, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prospects for cost reduction will focus on decreasing component costs (especially the scintillation crystals, which are a dominant component) and defining the axial extent needed for specific applications. For example, recent demonstrations that bismuth germanate scintillators may be able to support time-of-flight PET (59,60) offer one pathway to lowercost systems without sacrificing sensitivity. As indicated above, opportunities also exist to further improve the effective sensitivity, primarily through better timing resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospects for cost reduction will focus on decreasing component costs (especially the scintillation crystals, which are a dominant component) and defining the axial extent needed for specific applications. For example, recent demonstrations that bismuth germanate scintillators may be able to support time-of-flight PET (59,60) offer one pathway to lowercost systems without sacrificing sensitivity. As indicated above, opportunities also exist to further improve the effective sensitivity, primarily through better timing resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have also been investigating the potential for improving CTR by exploiting prompt emissions such as hot intra-band luminescence, Cherenkov yield from the primary photoelectron, or other methods that exploit sub-ps optical phenomena [Lecoq et al 2014, Gundacker et al 2016b, Dolenec 2013, Kwon et al 2016, Brunner et al 2017, Tao et al 2016, Tao et al 2017]. The ultimate goal of efforts to develop TOF-PET detectors with the ability to localize 511 keV photon interactions along LORs with an accuracy that approaches the spatial resolution limits dictated by positron range, 511 keV photon accolinearity, and detector element width [Levin et al 1999].…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All photon sources were assumed pure gamma‐emitters, so the beta ray normally released during the radioactive decay process was ignored to evaluate the response of the scintillator to the photons. To emulate the real detection environment, relevant parameters were carefully selected . The elemental composition and mass density of the BGO scintillator were Bi 4 Ge 3 O 12 and 7.13 g/cm 3 , respectively, and those of the plastic scintillator were H:C = 1:1.103 and 1.05 g/cm 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research, a method of beta–gamma‐ray separation was carried out using the sensitivity difference between plastic and cadmium tungstate (CdWO 4 ) scintillators, but the energy resolution of the cadmium tungstate was poor (14.6% at 662 keV) and the decay time was too long (12.7 μs). Bismuth germanate (Bi 4 Ge 3 O 12 , BGO) was used in this study for these reasons and because it is a candidate material which has been used to detect gamma rays in medical applications . One of the issues in previous study was the energy dependence of the sensitivity for each scintillator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%