2021
DOI: 10.16993/jhlr.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biscriptuality as a Bridge to Biliteracy: The Development of Scriptual Skills in Reading and Writing in Russian as a Heritage Language in Germany

Abstract: Due to the specific context of language acquisition and language learning within a migration situation, students may have only restricted opportunities to acquire literacy (reading and writing) in their heritage language in institutional settings. Therefore, in migration contexts, students' literacy skills in different languages may follow different developmental paths resulting in various levels of reading and writing skills. While previous research has shown that the exposure to different scripts in biscript… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of the first-order proficiency factors' variance explained by the second-order competence varies with the ML and FL contributing more to the construct than the HL. The finding is quite expected since writing proficiencies in HL are very heterogeneous in second-generation immigrant students, owing to the limited learning opportunities given within a migration situation (Usanova & Schnoor, 2021a, 2021b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The amount of the first-order proficiency factors' variance explained by the second-order competence varies with the ML and FL contributing more to the construct than the HL. The finding is quite expected since writing proficiencies in HL are very heterogeneous in second-generation immigrant students, owing to the limited learning opportunities given within a migration situation (Usanova & Schnoor, 2021a, 2021b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%