2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisbenzylisoquinolines from Cissampelos pareira L. as antimalarial agents: Molecular docking, pharmacokinetics analysis, and molecular dynamic simulation studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using molecular mechanics‐generalized born surface area (MM‐GBSA) calculations to find the free binding energy is an excellent way to confirm the predicted potential affinity of a ligand for its protein target [28] . The more negative MM‐GBSA ΔG binding free energy values show greater binding free energy, indicating more efficient interaction and a more stable ligand‐receptor complex [29] . In this study, prime MM‐GBSA ΔG binding free energy values were computed to analyze the binding modes of the most active compounds ( 4 b , 4 c , and 4 e ) into the selected protein targets to determine the binding stability between ligand and receptor complexes of docked molecules through calculating the free binding energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using molecular mechanics‐generalized born surface area (MM‐GBSA) calculations to find the free binding energy is an excellent way to confirm the predicted potential affinity of a ligand for its protein target [28] . The more negative MM‐GBSA ΔG binding free energy values show greater binding free energy, indicating more efficient interaction and a more stable ligand‐receptor complex [29] . In this study, prime MM‐GBSA ΔG binding free energy values were computed to analyze the binding modes of the most active compounds ( 4 b , 4 c , and 4 e ) into the selected protein targets to determine the binding stability between ligand and receptor complexes of docked molecules through calculating the free binding energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] The more negative MM-GBSA ΔG binding free energy values show greater binding free energy, indicating more efficient interaction and a more stable ligand-receptor complex. [29] In this study, prime MM-GBSA ΔG binding free energy values were computed to analyze the binding modes of the most active compounds (4 b, 4 c, and 4 e) into the selected protein targets to determine the binding stability between ligand and receptor complexes of docked molecules through calculating the free binding energy. The IFD docking scores (kcal/mol) and MM-GBSA ΔG binding free energies were used to determine the binding properties and binding affinity of molecules.…”
Section: Molecular Docking Studies and Prime Mm-gbsa δG Binding Free ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 33 ] The more negative MM‐GBSA Δ G binding free energy values show greater binding free energy indicating more efficient interaction and more stable ligand–receptor complex. [ 34 ] In this study, prime MM‐GBSA Δ G binding free energy values were computed to analyze the binding modes of the most active compounds ( 4 , 5 , and 6 ) into the selected protein targets to determine the binding stability between ligand and receptor complexes of docked molecules through calculating the free binding energy. The IFD docking scores (kcal/mol) and MM‐GBSA Δ G binding free energies (kcal/mol) were used to determine the binding properties and binding affinity of molecules and they were given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…falciparum 74 , Hayatinine and Curine have been reported to putatively bind Pfdihydrofolate reductase, PfcGMP-dependent protein kinase, and Pfprolyl-tRNA synthetase 75 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%