2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01633.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIS does not predict dreams reported after anaesthesia

Abstract: Dreaming during anaesthesia seems to be a separate phenomenon, not in general related to insufficient anaesthesia as indicated by high BIS levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result contrasts with studies during general anaesthesia reporting that BIS values were not significantly different between dreamers and nondreamers [9][10][11]. This suggests that a certain depth of anaesthesia is required before dreaming can occur and could be explored further using a randomized trial design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Our result contrasts with studies during general anaesthesia reporting that BIS values were not significantly different between dreamers and nondreamers [9][10][11]. This suggests that a certain depth of anaesthesia is required before dreaming can occur and could be explored further using a randomized trial design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…It is apparent that there may be an incidence of intraoperative awareness that persists despite a low displayed BIS value and the best preventative efforts 27 . Dreaming during anaesthesia seems to be a separate phenomenon, not in general related to insufficient anaesthesia as indicated by BIS levels 28,29 . BIS does not consistently reflect anaesthetic depth for different anaesthetic drug combinations 30,31 and has not been studied extensively in the presence of concomitant medications especially in elderly patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will result in both false negative and false positive errors – which cannot be overcome with more sophisticated signal processing techniques. The numerous reports of failed detection of consciousness with recall 94 , dreaming 11,95 and response on the isolated forearm technique (connected consciousness) 33,34,96 by currently-used depth of anesthesia monitors are eloquent witness to this problem. To detect consciousness reliably, the electroencephalographic index should directly correspond with the actual neurobiological process required for consciousness – i.e.…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%