“…In contrast, in 2 the two carbazol-9-yl ligands lie parallel, but are rotated 180 • away from each other with the Cd-N bond lying approximately perpendicular to the plane of the carbazol-9yl ligand [101.6(5), 97.9(5) • ] in a similar configuration to that for (1,2,4-t Bu 3 C 5 H 2 ) 2 Cd (92.5 • ). 28 The bonding between the t Bu 4 carb ligands and the Cd centre in 2 is in sharp contrast to that for the complexes (1,8-Ph 2 -3,6-Me 2 C 12 H 4 N) 2 M (M = Mn, Fe), 12 in which the M-N bonds are almost coincident with the least squares planes of the carbazol-9-yl ligands. The central nitrogen-containing ring in 1 deviates from planarity, leading to significant puckering of the t Bu 4 carbligands, which is much less pronounced in 2.…”