1985
DOI: 10.1136/adc.60.5.440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birthweight between 14 and 42 weeks' gestation.

Abstract: The mean weights of the sample differ considerably from those of the Gairdner and Pearson chart which are, therefore, considered to be inappropriate for the Sheffield population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a group, the birth weights were appropriate for gestational age (51 % of the weights lay above the mean for gestational age [21] and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar to those reported previously, giv en that the sample had a mean birth weight of 1.69 kg [22]. The mean systolic blood pressure rose with increasing birth weight, gestational age and postnatal age as has previously been described [19,[23][24][25].…”
Section: 20]supporting
confidence: 55%
“…As a group, the birth weights were appropriate for gestational age (51 % of the weights lay above the mean for gestational age [21] and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar to those reported previously, giv en that the sample had a mean birth weight of 1.69 kg [22]. The mean systolic blood pressure rose with increasing birth weight, gestational age and postnatal age as has previously been described [19,[23][24][25].…”
Section: 20]supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The birthweight, length and head circumference of each baby were expressed as standard deviation scores for gestation based on reference data in order to separate the outcome measures of gestational age and quality of intrauterine growth. The data published by Babson (1970) were used as reference data for length and head circumference, but for birthweight we used data from Keen and Pearse (1985) which used data based on clinical gestational assessment rather than menstrual history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well known concept to child health workers. The prevalence varies, but in some communities has been reported to be as high as 5 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]) and the mean difference in ages of the two groups of children at the time of measurement was four days. The difference between the mean birth weight and gestation of the children who failed to thrive (3343 g, 39-4 weeks) and those of the control children (3355 g, 39-6 weeks) was not significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%