Abstract:BackgroundChildhood asthma may have a fetal origin through fetal growth and development of the immunocompetence or respiratory organs.ObjectiveWe examined to which extent short gestational age, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction were associated with an increased risk of asthma hospitalization in childhood.MethodsWe undertook a cohort study based on several national registers in Denmark, Sweden and Finland. We included all live singleton born children in Denmark during 1979-2005 (N = 1,538,093), in S… Show more
“…In addition, various studies have detected positive correlations between in utero PCB exposure, which is frequently associated with the consumption of fish, and the risk of a low birth weight [48,49]. We did not detect a significant relationship between birth weight and PCB in the present study (data not shown); however, some studies have indicated that a link exists between low birth weight and childhood allergies [50,51]. Furthermore, it remains unclear which types of PCB congeners and PCB homologs are associated with childhood conditions, such as allergies.…”
“…In addition, various studies have detected positive correlations between in utero PCB exposure, which is frequently associated with the consumption of fish, and the risk of a low birth weight [48,49]. We did not detect a significant relationship between birth weight and PCB in the present study (data not shown); however, some studies have indicated that a link exists between low birth weight and childhood allergies [50,51]. Furthermore, it remains unclear which types of PCB congeners and PCB homologs are associated with childhood conditions, such as allergies.…”
“…Indeed, by using a propensity score approach to control for confounders, it has been showed that birth weight is not associated with the risk of asthma during the first six years of life 68 . In addition, after considering the maternal smoking status in pregnancy 27 and gestational age 26,69 , the estimated association size between lower birth weight with asthma is much reduced. Therefore, our MR results are consistent with these observational studies that properly controlled for confounding effects, providing additional evidence supporting that birth weight may not be directly associated with adult asthma.…”
The association between lower birth weight and childhood asthma is well established. However, it remains unclear whether the influence of lower birth weight on asthma can persist into adulthood. We conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis to assess the causal relationship of birth weight (~140,000 individuals) on the risk of adult asthma (~62,000 individuals). We estimated the causal effect of birth weight to be 1.00 (95% CI 0.98~1.03,
p
= 0.737) using the genetic risk score method. We did not observe nonlinear relationship or gender difference for the estimated causal effect. With the inverse-variance weighted method, the causal effect of birth weight on adult asthma was estimated to be 1.02 (95% CI 0.84~1.24,
p
= 0.813). Additionally, the iMAP method provides no additional genome-wide evidence supporting the causal effects of birth weight on adult asthma. Our results were robust against various sensitivity analyses, and MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger regression showed that no instrument outliers and no horizontal pleiotropy were likely to bias the results. Overall, our study provides no evidence for the fetal origins of diseases hypothesis for adult asthma, implying that the impact of birth weight on asthma in years of children and adolescents does not persist into adult and previous findings may be biased by confounders.
“…The prevalence rate varies among countries, the increase pattern usually observed in many Low- and Middle-Income counties, especially in Eastern Europe and Latin American, as well as Northern African countries [4, 5]. The cause of asthma remains unclear and current research paints a complex picture [6, 7].…”
BackgroundPreterm birth can interrupt lung development in utero and is associated with early life factors, which adversely affects the developing respiratory system. Studies on preterm birth and asthma risk are comparatively sparse and the results are not consistent.MethodsMultivariate analyses were performed on a cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) collected in 2011 to 2012. The NSCH was a nationally representative telephone survey sponsored by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. A cross-sectional analysis using data from the US on 90,721 children was conducted to examine the relationship between preterm birth and asthma risk.ResultsA total of 90,721 children under 17 years were included and 12% of the children were reported as preterm birth. The prevalence of diagnosed asthma was 15%, with a male to female ratio of 1.26:1. Children who were born preterm were 1.64 times (95% confidence interval: 1.45–1.84) more likely to develop asthma compared with those who were born term after controlling for confounders. Similarly, children who were low birth weight were 1.43 times (95% confidence interval: 1.25–1.63) more likely for asthma, and the odds ratio increased to 1.77 for those both preborn and low birth weight. Child’s gender, race/ethnicity, age, family structure, family income levels, and household smoking were significantly associated with the odds of reported asthma.ConclusionsPreterm birth was associated with increased risk of asthma among US children, supporting the notion that preterm birth may play a critical role in asthma development.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13052-018-0583-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.