1984
DOI: 10.1159/000153456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth Weight and Natural Selection

Abstract: Differential mortality as a function of birth weight was studied in newborns up to the 1st week of life in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh (India). It was found that both selection intensity and selective deaths were higher than in other studies. Furthermore, in the present study the values obtained were higher for female than for male newborns.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was less related to weight (odds ratio 2.0) and weight for length (odds ratio 1.3). Studies from India, Brazil and other countries have also established a strong relationship between perinatal mortality and length of gestation, but not really with birth weight (24,26,(28)(29). Concerning birth length we have not been able to find any other study for comparisons.…”
Section: Size At Birthmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, it was less related to weight (odds ratio 2.0) and weight for length (odds ratio 1.3). Studies from India, Brazil and other countries have also established a strong relationship between perinatal mortality and length of gestation, but not really with birth weight (24,26,(28)(29). Concerning birth length we have not been able to find any other study for comparisons.…”
Section: Size At Birthmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In previous studies it has been show that an infant's chance of surviving the perinatal period is closely related to its weight at birth (Terrenato, Gravina and Ulizzi 1981a;Wilcox and Russell, 1983;Rajanikumari and Rao, 1984). The curve of weight vs. mortality in all investigated human populations exhibits distinctive common features i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1955: ,Jayant, 1966: \'an Valen & Mellin, 1967Sansing & Chinnici, 1976;Chinnici & Sansing, 1977;I'romboon rt c d . 1983;Kalabushkin et al 1987;Rajanikumari & Rao, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%