For over 50 million years, every single mammal on Earth had to enter the world through a harrowing passage: the birth canal. The hazards of this journey, short in distance but potentially prolonged in duration, may have peaked in our own species, where the evolution of larger and larger brains at birth seems to have been limited by increasing risks to the survival of mother and child. With the development of animal husbandry and the near-mythic arrival of Gaius Julius Caesar, a few individuals began entering via another route, avoiding the "big squeeze" to spring forth fully formed from their mothers' incisions. Today, several factors, including efforts to limit the liability for medical malpractice, have resulted in ever more babies bypassing vaginal delivery in favor of cesarean delivery, accounting for 30% of American births. Because the survival rate after cesarean section (C-section) is excellent for both mother and offspring, the procedure has been largely regarded as benign.Now comes a report in PNAS from Castillo-Ruiz et al.(1) that, in mice, cesarean delivery has a rather unexpected effect on brain development that is both profound and widespread. Using caspase-3 production to identify cells about to "give up the ghost", they surveyed naturally occurring cell death (apoptosis) in 13 different brain regions and carefully controlled for a variety of factors to compare development in cesarean-delivered versus vaginally delivered newborns. The brains of mice delivered the oldfashioned way, through vaginal delivery, exhibited an abrupt and widespread pause in the normal process of cell death in almost every brain region examined, increasing the number of surviving cells. In cesarean-delivered pups, in contrast, the rates of cell death in the brain either continued unabated or even increased at delivery, resulting in a greater loss of cells than was seen in vaginally delivered mice. Mouse pups also differed in their vocalization after maternal separation, depending on whether they had undergone vaginal or cesarean delivery. These results raise a host of questions about whether cesarean delivery has a similar effect in humans, subjecting newborns to a greater loss of brain cells and potential alterations in neonatal behavior that could have lifelong consequences. Castillo-Ruiz et al. (1) cite several studies indicating an increased risk for autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in cesarean-delivered babies, but point out that the studies are controversial, in large part, because of the difficulty in adequately controlling for all of the confounding factors that distinguish women who delivery vaginally versus by C-section. Hence, they examined the question in mice so that they could control for other factors to show unequivocally that the mode of delivery affects brain development.Considering the circumstances around vaginal versus cesarean delivery, it may seem counterintuitive that vaginal delivery would host more benefits than cesarean delivery, because cesarean delivery is generally considered ...