Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review

Abstract

Whether predators can limit their prey has been a topic of scientific debate for decades. Traditionally it was believed that predators take only wounded, sick, old or otherwise low-quality individuals, and thus have little impact on prey populations. However, there is increasing evidence that, at least under certain circumstances, vertebrate predators may indeed limit prey numbers. This potential role of predators as limiting factors of prey populations has created conflicts between predators and human hunters, because the hunters may see predators as competitors for the same resources. A particularly acute conflict has emerged over the past few decades between gamebird hunters and birds of prey in Europe. As a part of a European-wide research project, we reviewed literature on the relationships between birds of prey and gamebirds. We start by analysing available data on the diets of 52 European raptor and owl species. There are some 32 species, mostly specialist predators feeding on small mammals, small passerine birds or insects, which never or very rarely include game animals (e.g. hares, rabbits, gamebirds) in their diet. A second group (20 species) consists of medium-sized and large raptors which prey on game, but for which the proportion in the diet varies temporally and spatially. Only three raptor species can have rather large proportions of gamebirds in their diet, and another seven species may utilise gamebirds locally to a great extent. We point out that the percentage of a given prey species in the diet of an avian predator does not necessarily reflect the impact of that predator on densities of prey populations. Next, we summarise available data on the numerical responses of avian predators to changing gamebird numbers. In half of these studies, no numerical response was found, while in the remainder a response was detected such that either raptor density or breeding success increased with density of gamebirds. Data on the functional responses of raptors were scarce. Most studies of the interaction between raptors and gamebird populations give some estimate of the predation rate (per cent of prey population taken by predator), but less often do they evaluate the subsequent reduction in the pre-harvest population or the potential limiting effect on breeding numbers. The few existing studies indicate that, under certain conditions, raptor predation may limit gamebird populations and reduce gamebird harvests. However, the number and extent of such studies are too modest to draw firm conclusions. Furthermore, their geographical bias to northern Europe, where predator-prey communities are typically simpler than in the south, precludes extrapolation to more diverse southern European ecosystems. There is an urgent need to develop further studies, particularly in southern Europe, to determine the functional and numerical responses of raptors to gamebird populations in species and environments other than those already evaluated in existing studies. Furthermore, additional field experiments are needed in which...

Wet Grasslands as a Green Infrastructure for Ecological Sustainability: Wader Conservation in Southern Sweden as a Case Study

“…Moreover, corvids are resident all year round and Scania provides wintering grounds for a number of birds of prey (Table 3). Ultimately, however, the increase in avian predator populations may be caused by a number of factors, such as changes in land use, vegetation change, re-introduction programs, milder winters and reductions in hunting and policy change that protects avian predators [81,82]. …”

Impacts and management of common buzzards Buteo buteo at pheasant Phasianus colchicus release pens in the UK: a review

“…As generalists, buzzards are able to adapt the composition of their diet to prey availability. In Fennoscandia, the main prey are voles with the most important alternative prey being water voles, shrews, forest grouse and hares (Reif et al 2001;Valkama et al 2005). This contrasts with the UK, where the most important component of the diet is rabbit with alternative prey of voles and birds more important in areas with low lagomorph abundance (Graham et al 1995;Swan and Etheridge 1995).…”

“…This contrasts with the UK, where the most important component of the diet is rabbit with alternative prey of voles and birds more important in areas with low lagomorph abundance (Graham et al 1995;Swan and Etheridge 1995). In a review of predation by birds of prey and gamebirds, the proportion of prey items that were gamebirds ranged from 2.6 to 15.1 % in the UK and <0.1 to 7.4 % for other European countries (Valkama et al 2005). A more recent UK study recorded 5.3 % gamebirds (Swan 2011).…”

“…Conflict occurs where different groups of stakeholders disagree over the management of a species and is frequently manifest in respect to predator species whose populations are, or were formerly, threatened, or are species considered to be charismatic or iconic (Manosa 2002;Woodroffe et al 2005). For birds of prey, there are long-standing conflicts with gamebird, poultry and other livestock interests, and more recently in respect to avian species of conservation concern (JNCC 2000; Thompson et al 2003;Valkama et al 2005;Gibbons et al 2007).…”

When hunting benefits raptors: a case study of game species and vultures

“…Effects on game species include overexploitation (Lindsey et al 2007), threats to genetic integrity (Blanco-Aguiar et al 2008 and references therein) and modification of their behaviour (Benhaiem et al 2008). Effects on non-game species reported include illegal killing of predators (Thirgood et al 2000;Valkama et al 2005), reduction of their prey (Lozano et al 2007), modification of the animal behaviour (Casas et al 2009) and decreases in recruitment of trees dispersed by game species (Nunez-Iturri et al 2008). In contrast, relatively few studies have examined positive effects of hunting on wildlife and/or ecosystem conservation (but see Thirgood et al 2000;Baker 1997;Lindsey et al 2006Lindsey et al , 2007White et al 2008).…”