2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517131113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain

Abstract: Some birds achieve primate-like levels of cognition, even though their brains tend to be much smaller in absolute size. This poses a fundamental problem in comparative and computational neuroscience, because small brains are expected to have a lower information-processing capacity. Using the isotropic fractionator to determine numbers of neurons in specific brain regions, here we show that the brains of parrots and songbirds contain on average twice as many neurons as primate brains of the same mass, indicatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
437
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
437
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this cell quantification technique has been found by three independent groups to yield results that are comparable to those obtained with unbiased stereology, but are much faster to obtain and far less prone to user error and undersampling [66][67][68]. The consistency of the approach and technique across studies allowed us to collect data that could be compared systematically across structures in individual brains; across individuals of the same species; across species within a clade; across mammalian clades ( Figure 4); and even across mammals, birds, and non-avian reptiles [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][69][70][71]. While published results have so far been limited to numbers of neuronal and non-neuronal cells, one advantage of the isotropic fractionator is that, because all tissue heterogeneities in cell distribution are literally dissolved, only very small samples are required for counting, which allows for storage of the remaining suspension at −20 • C for later studies employing new markers or morphological criteria [65].…”
Section: Quantitative Neuroanatomy: Counting Cells By Turning Brains mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Importantly, this cell quantification technique has been found by three independent groups to yield results that are comparable to those obtained with unbiased stereology, but are much faster to obtain and far less prone to user error and undersampling [66][67][68]. The consistency of the approach and technique across studies allowed us to collect data that could be compared systematically across structures in individual brains; across individuals of the same species; across species within a clade; across mammalian clades ( Figure 4); and even across mammals, birds, and non-avian reptiles [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][69][70][71]. While published results have so far been limited to numbers of neuronal and non-neuronal cells, one advantage of the isotropic fractionator is that, because all tissue heterogeneities in cell distribution are literally dissolved, only very small samples are required for counting, which allows for storage of the remaining suspension at −20 • C for later studies employing new markers or morphological criteria [65].…”
Section: Quantitative Neuroanatomy: Counting Cells By Turning Brains mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A recent study in parrots and songbirds emphasized the importance of numbers of telencephalic neurons in the pallium which provide a means of increasing computational capacity. It supports the concept these birds have advanced behavioural and cognitive complexity (Olkowicz et al, 2016). However, this claim about the emergence of consciousness from a specific brain organization ignores an important fact about the evolution of different nervous systems: these structures, absent in species evolutionarily distant from mammals or birds, such as invertebrates, could eventually be functionally substituted by other structures.…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It is restricted to space allowance and freedom of movement, whereas many more conditions determine an animal's welfare. The (Azevedo et al 2009, Herculano-Houzel 2009 b (Herculano-Houzel 2016) c The number only refers to neocortical neurons (Jelsing et al 2006); hence, it underestimates the cortical neurons d (Olkowicz et al 2016) e The body mass of a salmon was assumed to equal 4.5 kg (FRS Marine Laboratory 2006), while the brain:body mass ratio was assumed to equal that of a shark-1:2496 (Serendip 2016) f (Lobster Institute 2016) g (Burne et al 2011;Shulman and Bostrom 2012) h The factor difference between an adult insect and the larva (a mealworm is the larva of the mealworm beetle) was assumed to equal that of a zebrafish, which is a factor of 10: a larval zebrafish has 100,000 neurons (Naumann et al 2010), while an adult zebrafish has 1 million neurons (Alivisatos et al 2012) (Bartussek 1995a(Bartussek , 1995b(Bartussek , 1996 and the Welfare Quality® Consortium (Welfare Quality® 2009aQuality® , 2009bQuality® , 2009c can, however, not be applied at large scale due to data scarcity. Therefore, a balance must be found between scalability and indicator complexity.…”
Section: Animal Welfare Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%