2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-020-2798-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birds from matched developmental environments breed faster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Habitat quality early in life (i.e., 'developmental environment quality') can determine the fitness of individuals in the current (direct) and next generations (indirect), thereby regulating physiological and behavioural responses as well as population dynamics and evolution (Mousseau and Fox 1998;Wolf et al 1998). Studies in both invertebrate and vertebrate species have shown that the quality of the developmental environment can influence fitness traits in adulthood [e.g., (Booth and Wellington 1998;Stevens et al 1999Stevens et al , 2000Steigenga and Fischer 2009;Spencer et al 2010;May et al 2015;Stefana et al 2017;Eyck et al 2020)], canalising individuals into strategies that in turn affect population dynamics (Booth 1995;Lindström 1999;Gaillard et al 2000;Monaghan 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat quality early in life (i.e., 'developmental environment quality') can determine the fitness of individuals in the current (direct) and next generations (indirect), thereby regulating physiological and behavioural responses as well as population dynamics and evolution (Mousseau and Fox 1998;Wolf et al 1998). Studies in both invertebrate and vertebrate species have shown that the quality of the developmental environment can influence fitness traits in adulthood [e.g., (Booth and Wellington 1998;Stevens et al 1999Stevens et al , 2000Steigenga and Fischer 2009;Spencer et al 2010;May et al 2015;Stefana et al 2017;Eyck et al 2020)], canalising individuals into strategies that in turn affect population dynamics (Booth 1995;Lindström 1999;Gaillard et al 2000;Monaghan 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that we were reliably testing the effect of treatment group on embryonic and vitelline blood vessel DNA methylation, we included additional variables within the models that have previously been indicated in contributing to maternal CORT and/or DNA methylation differences. These variables included clutch size (Lindner et al., 2021; Sheldon, Schrey, Ragsdale, & Griffith, 2018), clutch number (first or second clutch laid, independent of treatment group; Romero & Wingfield, 2016), maternal condition (Nager et al., 1999; Newbrey & Reed, 2009; here as scaled mass index, calculated as in Peig & Green, 2009), egg mass (Henriksen et al., 2011), and lay latency (Eyck et al., 2020; Schoech et al., 2009). Egg number was included in the models to eliminate the potential carry‐over effect of CORT dosing or DNA methylation (i.e., an increase or decrease with lay order).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it may reflect phenotypic interactions between mating individuals. For example, behavioural phenotypes can affect 'social compatibility' [50,184], mitigating intra-pair aggression [185] or aiding behaviours such as foraging, parenting [50,182,186] and conjugation [187,188]. As pair-bonding monogamists engaging in biparental care [189], humans are candidates for social compatibility [13,50], and there is some evidence that social similarity improves cooperation [71] and relationship satisfaction in mated pairs [46,117,190,191] (although see [192]; also see [29,143,191,193] on possible compatibility arising from dissimilarity).…”
Section: Ultimate Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%