2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird species dynamics in a managed southern boreal forest in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, variation of the most common species was rather similar between the landscapes: variances differed statistically significantly between the three areas only in two out of the 10 most common species. One of these species, the siskin, is known to occur sporadically, as it is a seed eater of spruce (Va¨isa¨nen et al 1998;Virkkala 2004). Bird assemblages of the three landscapes are similar not only in terms of species composition and species density, but also in species spatial density variation patterns across the landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, variation of the most common species was rather similar between the landscapes: variances differed statistically significantly between the three areas only in two out of the 10 most common species. One of these species, the siskin, is known to occur sporadically, as it is a seed eater of spruce (Va¨isa¨nen et al 1998;Virkkala 2004). Bird assemblages of the three landscapes are similar not only in terms of species composition and species density, but also in species spatial density variation patterns across the landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason can be that, in these mostly naturally regenerated and thus relatively species rich stands (Lõhmus and Kraut, 2010), stand composition effects are mostly manifested in the presence of particular tree species. For example, Populus tremula is the most important cavity-tree species throughout its range (Remm and Lõhmus, 2011), while Picea abies may be essential for some specialized seed-eaters (Virkkala, 2004). Such effects can be hidden in the simple measure of tree-species diversity (e.g.…”
Section: Effects Of Forest Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the line transect method a 50 m wide main belt along the walking line and a supplementary belt outside the main belt are separated. The supplementary belt consists of all the birds observed outside the main belt (Järvinen & Väisänen 1976, Järvinen et al 1991, Väisänen et al 1998, Virkkala 2004.…”
Section: мAterials and мEthodsmentioning
confidence: 99%