2014
DOI: 10.3354/meps10839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird mortality from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. II. Carcass sampling and exposure probability in the coastal Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure probability models in which seabird strandings are assessed as a proportion of at-sea densities may provide more accurate estimations of at-sea mortality [6, 11]. However, to monitor at-sea densities is expensive and logistically challenging, making this unsuitable for developing countries such as Brazil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Exposure probability models in which seabird strandings are assessed as a proportion of at-sea densities may provide more accurate estimations of at-sea mortality [6, 11]. However, to monitor at-sea densities is expensive and logistically challenging, making this unsuitable for developing countries such as Brazil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We organized and analysed data on seabird strandings and predictive predictor variables at a monthly scale in order to cover a feasible timespan in which seabird deaths at sea could be reflected in beaches due to carcass drift and delayed mortality [6], and to reduce excessive zeroes in data as a consequence of a low number of strandings. Therefore, 11 sampling sites were monitored during 35 months, totalling 385 observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations