Bird evolution: testing the metaves clade with six new mitochondrial genomes

Abstract

BackgroundEvolutionary biologists are often misled by convergence of morphology and this has been common in the study of bird evolution. However, the use of molecular data sets have their own problems and phylogenies based on short DNA sequences have the potential to mislead us too. The relationships among clades and timing of the evolution of modern birds (Neoaves) has not yet been well resolved. Evidence of convergence of morphology remain controversial. With six new bird mitochondrial genomes (hummingbird, swift, kagu, rail, flamingo and grebe) we test the proposed Metaves/Coronaves division within Neoaves and the parallel radiations in this primary avian clade.ResultsOur mitochondrial trees did not return the Metaves clade that had been proposed based on one nuclear intron sequence. We suggest that the high number of indels within the seventh intron of the β-fibrinogen gene at this phylogenetic level, which left a dataset with not a single site across the alignment shared by all taxa, resulted in artifacts during analysis. With respect to the overall avian tree, we find the flamingo and grebe are sister taxa and basal to the shorebirds (Charadriiformes). Using a novel site-stripping technique for noise-reduction we found this relationship to be stable. The hummingbird/swift clade is outside the large and very diverse group of raptors, shore and sea birds. Unexpectedly the kagu is not closely related to the rail in our analysis, but because neither the kagu nor the rail have close affinity to any taxa within this dataset of 41 birds, their placement is not yet resolved.ConclusionOur phylogenetic hypothesis based on 41 avian mitochondrial genomes (13,229 bp) rejects monophyly of seven Metaves species and we therefore conclude that the members of Metaves do not share a common evolutionary history within the Neoaves.

The evolutionary history of cockatoos (Aves: Psittaciformes: Cacatuidae)

“…First, following the avian mitochondrial study of Morgan-Richards et al (2008), initial data exploration in PAUP v4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002) was conducted to determine whether RY-coding (A, G ? R; C, T ?…”

The mitochondrial genome of pin-tailed snipe Gallinago stenura, and its implications for the phylogeny of Charadriiformes

“…The genome-level characteristics of mitogenomes include the base composition, codon usage, gene order arrangement, tRNA and rRNA gene secondary structures, and the signaling genes control of replication and transcription [14, 17]. Such information has been used to show potential in resolving ancient patterns of evolutionary history, and also for developing conservation management programs for endangered species [8, 18, 19]. In the past decade, the number of sequenced mitogenomes have accumulated and these sequences have been widely used in biological research, especially when studying molecular evolution, genetic structure, and phylogeography [20–27].…”

Phylogenetically vetted and stratigraphically constrained fossil calibrations within Aves

“…Alternative hypotheses include a sister group relationship between Sphenisciformes and a core clade of 'Pelecaniformes', supported by analysis of sequence data from the beta-fibrinogen gene (Fain and Houde, 2004) and morphological characters (Mayr, 2005b); a sister group relationships between Sphenisciformes and Podicipediformes + Gaviiformes recovered by analysis of morphological data (Smith, 2010); and a sister group relationship between Sphenisciformes and Ciconiiformes recovered from some analyses of mitochondrial data (Slack et al, 2003;Harrison et al, 2004;Watanabe et al, 2006). Notably, all of these taxa are supported as part of a large waterbird clade by most recent analyses (Ericson et al, 2006;Livezey andZusi, 2006, 2007;Hackett et al, 2008;Morgan-Richards et al, 2008;Pratt et al, 2009). We consider a sister group relationship between Sphenisciformes and Procellariiformes to be the most FIGURE 4.…”